These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 687239)

  • 1. An effect of linguistic experience. Auditory word discrimination by native and non-native speakers of English.
    Gat IB; Keith RW
    Audiology; 1978; 17(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 687239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bilingualism and Speech Understanding in Noise: Auditory and Linguistic Factors.
    Skoe E; Karayanidi K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):115-130. PubMed ID: 30461397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception in noise by monolingual, bilingual and trilingual listeners.
    Tabri D; Abou Chacra KM; Pring T
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(4):411-22. PubMed ID: 21771217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of background noise on perception of English speech for Japanese listeners.
    Shimizu T; Makishima K; Yoshida M; Yamagishi H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2002 Apr; 29(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 11893445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of speech-shaped noise on the recognition of malayalam and english consonants by malayalam listeners.
    Kalaiah MK; Bhat JS; Shastri U
    Noise Health; 2019; 21(99):55-61. PubMed ID: 32174639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Masking Release for Igbo and English.
    Ebem DU; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Uguru JO
    Afr J Comput Ict; 2013 Sep; 6(3):119-126. PubMed ID: 25343019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How noise and language proficiency influence speech recognition by individual non-native listeners.
    Zhang J; Xie L; Li Y; Chatterjee M; Ding N
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113386. PubMed ID: 25409435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of noise and proficiency on intelligibility of Chinese-accented English.
    Rogers CL; Dalby J; Nishi K
    Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 2):139-54. PubMed ID: 15581189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.
    Suresh CH; Krishnan A; Gandour JT
    Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 355():42-53. PubMed ID: 28927640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modulation of Cross-Language Activation During Bilingual Auditory Word Recognition: Effects of Language Experience but Not Competing Background Noise.
    Fricke M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():674157. PubMed ID: 35282207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English.
    Flege JE; Hillenbrand J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):508-17. PubMed ID: 3950204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Second Language Experience Facilitates Sentence Recognition in Temporally-Modulated Noise for Non-native Listeners.
    Guan J; Cao X; Liu C
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():631060. PubMed ID: 33897538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of linguistic background on staggered spondaic word and dichotic consonant vowel scores.
    Keith RW; Katbamna B; Tawfik S; Smolak LH
    Br J Audiol; 1987 Feb; 21(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3828581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Native Italian speakers' perception and production of English vowels.
    Flege JE; MacKay IR; Meador D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2973-87. PubMed ID: 10573909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Word discrimination in the presence of competing speech with children.
    Chermak GD; Zielonko B
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(5):188-92. PubMed ID: 856780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of language experience and stimulus context on the neural organization and categorical perception of speech.
    Bidelman GM; Lee CC
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():191-200. PubMed ID: 26146197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digit speech recognition thresholds (SRT) for non-native speakers of English.
    Ramkissoon I; Proctor A; Lansing CR; Bilger RC
    Am J Audiol; 2002 Jun; 11(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12227354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Music training enhances the automatic neural processing of foreign speech sounds.
    Intartaglia B; White-Schwoch T; Kraus N; Schön D
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12631. PubMed ID: 28974695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.