These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6874303)

  • 1. Clinical use of non-stressed in-patient antenatal cardiotocography.
    McKenna PJ
    Ir Med J; 1983 May; 76(5):245-6. PubMed ID: 6874303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The monitoring of high-risk pregnancy by non-stressed antepartum cardiotocography.
    Kulkarni S; Matadial L
    West Indian Med J; 1985 Sep; 34(3):190-3. PubMed ID: 4072183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Changes in and characteristics of the monitoring of the reactivity and variability of the heart rate of the premature fetus during a non stress test (NST)].
    Ivanov S; Georgiev R
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1983; 22(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 6638376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Diagnostic potentials of antenatal cardiotocography in the fetal growth retardation syndrome].
    Bunin AT; Ivanova IM
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1984 Jun; (6):24-7. PubMed ID: 6476242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-stress antenatal cardiotocography in high risk pregnancy.
    Kuhn RJ
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Mar; 8(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 7092721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical experience in non-stressed antepartum cardiotocography in high-risk pregnancies.
    Varma TR
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1981 Dec; 19(6):433-9. PubMed ID: 6121724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Potentials of cardiotocography in assessing the antenatal risk in EPH gestoses].
    Bozhinova S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1984; 23(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 6742360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stress and nonstress antepartum monitoring.
    Petrie RH
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1980; 44():151-69. PubMed ID: 6994120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Role of FHR accelerations in outpatient assessment of the fetal status in pregnancy].
    Valensise H; Tranquilli A; Bruno L; Paparatti L; Fischetti MC; Bompiani A
    Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1982; 103(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 7181358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stress and nonstress antepartum fetal monitoring: current status.
    Weingold AB; Yonekura ML; O'Kieffe J
    Obstet Gynecol Annu; 1980; 9():139-67. PubMed ID: 7402501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Does Doppler blood flow measurement and the fetal actogram proven advantages over the classical fetal monitoring in pregnancy with the aid of cardiotocography? ].
    Heinrich J
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(11):721-4. PubMed ID: 2970738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Monitoring labor with cardiotocography and stethoscopic examination in normal and risk deliveries].
    Neldam S; Osler M; Hansen PK; Nim J; Smith SF; Hertel J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1985 Sep; 147(37):2901-7. PubMed ID: 3901456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Critical and comparative evaluation of some methods of interpreting cardiotocography in pregnancy].
    De Nigris C; Sommaruga R; Macecchini A; Tomassini A; Zanzi R; Campagna G
    Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1980; 101(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 7247200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antepartal cardiotocography in the assessment of fetal outcome.
    Käär K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1980; 94():1-56. PubMed ID: 6935909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Midwifery. 1. Dynamic tests of fetal well-being. II: Antenatal cardiotocography.
    Pearson J
    Nurs Mirror; 1981 Jul; 153(2):xiv-xix. PubMed ID: 6911655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory evoked response: a new approach for the evaluation of the unborn fetus.
    Pereira Luz N; Pereira Lima C; Germany Paula L; Hecker Luz J
    Reproduccion; 1980; 4(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 7461277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of auditory versus electronic assessment of antenatal fetal welfare.
    O'Leary JA; Mendenhall HW; Andrinopoulos GC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):244-6. PubMed ID: 7393517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative evaluation of the TM and Doppler methods in detecting fetal cardiac activity in the I trimester of pregnancy].
    Stygar AM
    Vopr Okhr Materin Det; 1980 Aug; 25(8):64-6. PubMed ID: 7415041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advances on the horizon.
    Murata Y
    Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):433-41. PubMed ID: 7116753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Telemetric transmission of fetal cardiac rhythm in monitoring high risk pregnancies (author's transl)].
    Crépin G; Querleu D; Meurette J; Laloux V
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1981; 10(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 7338600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.