These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6874341)

  • 1. A nearly mono-energetic 6-7 MeV photon calibration source.
    Rogers DW
    Health Phys; 1983 Jul; 45(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 6874341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photonuclear dose calculations for high-energy photon beams from Siemens and Varian linacs.
    Chibani O; Ma CM
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1990-2000. PubMed ID: 12945965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual scattering foil design for poly-energetic electron beams.
    Kainz KK; Antolak JA; Almond PR; Bloch CD; Hogstrom KR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):755-67. PubMed ID: 15798252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.
    Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo simulations of the photon calibration fields at the underground laboratory of PTB.
    Kowatari M; Dombrowski H; Neumaier S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):125-35. PubMed ID: 20924123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fluence to dose equivalent conversion factors calculated with EGS3 for electrons from 100 keV to 20 GeV and photons from 11 keV to 20 GeV.
    Rogers DW
    Health Phys; 1984 Apr; 46(4):891-914. PubMed ID: 6546741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of the electron transport in mcnp5 and its suitability for ionization chamber response simulations: A comparison with the egsnrc and penelope codes.
    Koivunoro H; Siiskonen T; Kotiluoto P; Auterinen I; Hippelainen E; Savolainen S
    Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1335-44. PubMed ID: 22380366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of Gamma Knife Perfexion™ source based on Monte Carlo simulation.
    Junios J; Irhas I; Novitrian N; Soediatmoko E; Haryanto F; Su'ud Z; Fielding AL
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Dec; 13(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 33030642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shielding implications for secondary neutrons and photons produced within the patient during IMPT.
    DeMarco J; Kupelian P; Santhanam A; Low D
    Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071701. PubMed ID: 23822405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo studies on photon interactions in radiobiological experiments.
    Shahmohammadi Beni M; Krstic D; Nikezic D; Yu KN
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193575. PubMed ID: 29561871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the effect of electron density in photon dose calculations.
    Seco J; Evans PM
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):540-52. PubMed ID: 16532961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation in the calibrated response of LiF, Al2O3, and silicon dosimeters when used for in-phantom measurements of source photons with energies between 30 KeV AND 300 KeV.
    Poudel S; Currier B; Medich DC
    Health Phys; 2015 Apr; 108(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 25706137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The response of a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter in megavoltage photon and electron beams.
    Araki F; Ohno T
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122102. PubMed ID: 25471975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining the incident electron fluence for Monte Carlo-based photon treatment planning using a standard measured data set.
    Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Libby B; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 12722809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Photon dose mixed in monoenergetic neutron calibration fields using 7Li(p,n)7Be reaction.
    Tanimura Y; Tsutsumi M; Yoshizawa M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):149-52. PubMed ID: 24482042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Air kerma reference field with high energy photons using a 15 MeV electron beam from a clinical linear accelerator.
    Ishii J; Shimizu M; Kato M; Kurosawa T; Watabe H
    J Radiol Prot; 2024 Jan; 44(1):. PubMed ID: 38232406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Realistic dosimetry for studies on biological responses to X-rays and γ-rays.
    Shahmohammadi Beni M; Krstic D; Nikezic D; Yu KN
    J Radiat Res; 2017 Sep; 58(5):729-736. PubMed ID: 28444359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo simulation of MOSFET detectors for high-energy photon beams using the PENELOPE code.
    Panettieri V; Duch MA; Jornet N; Ginjaume M; Carrasco P; Badal A; Ortega X; Ribas M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):303-16. PubMed ID: 17183143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimetric response of variable-size cavities in photon-irradiated media and the behaviour of the Spencer-Attix cavity integral with increasing Δ.
    Kumar S; Deshpande DD; Nahum AE
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 61(7):2680-704. PubMed ID: 26976308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for a high-energy photon beam.
    Ding GX
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2459-63. PubMed ID: 12462709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.