These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6874559)

  • 1. Applicant selection procedures: a more objective approach to the interview process.
    Vojir CP; Bronstein RA
    J Allied Health; 1983 May; 12(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 6874559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selection of medical technology students in a hospital-based program.
    Bobek JR; Fleck MA; Moyer K; Paules CA
    J Allied Health; 1984 Aug; 13(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 6501078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The admissions process of a bachelor of science in nursing program: initial reliability and validity of the personal interview.
    Carpio B; Brown B
    Can J Nurs Res; 1993; 25(3):41-52. PubMed ID: 8118768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Putting objectivity in the allied health student selection process.
    Dietrich MC
    J Allied Health; 1981 Nov; 10(4):226-39. PubMed ID: 7328034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalisability of a composite student selection programme.
    O'Neill LD; Korsholm L; Wallstedt B; Eika B; Hartvigsen J
    Med Educ; 2009 Jan; 43(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 19140998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical student selection: choice of a semi-structured panel interview or an unstructured one-on-one interview.
    Ann Courneya C; Wright K; Frinton V; Mak E; Schulzer M; Pachev G
    Med Teach; 2005 Sep; 27(6):499-503. PubMed ID: 16199355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uniform admissions system for a medical laboratory sciences program.
    Rifken SM; Maturen A; Bradna JJ; Brace L; Jacobs M
    Am J Med Technol; 1981 Jun; 47(6):489-99. PubMed ID: 7270567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A structured interview for dental school admissions.
    Graham JW; Boyd MA
    J Dent Educ; 1982 Feb; 46(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 6948867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of stepwise regression computer program as an aid in the selection of medical technology students.
    Feeley MA
    Am J Med Technol; 1975 Feb; 41(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 1115082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
    Brothers TE; Wetherholt S
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of the interview in student selection.
    Crocker L
    Am J Med Technol; 1978 May; 44(5):438-42. PubMed ID: 677158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Admission criteria and student success in a medical radiation sciences program.
    Kwan J; Childs RA; Cherryman F; Palmer C; Catton P
    J Allied Health; 2009; 38(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 19753427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matriculating student perceptions of changes to the admissions interview process at the University of Wisconsin Medical School: a prospective, controlled comparison.
    Albanese MA; Snow M; Skochelak S; Huggett K; Farrell PM
    WMJ; 2003; 102(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 12754905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Family practice resident selection using a videotaped interview.
    Sparti P
    Fam Med; 1986; 18(1):40-1. PubMed ID: 3556845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the use of standardized recommendation forms in admissions in radiologic technology, medical technology, and dietetics.
    McCabe BJ; Blagg JD; Gardner J; Shook B
    J Allied Health; 1989; 18(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 2745228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical school application interview score has limited predictive validity for performance on a fourth year clinical practice examination.
    Basco WT; Lancaster CJ; Gilbert GE; Carey ME; Blue AV
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 17089077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Admission procedures: A survey of current methodology.
    Garza JV; Adams JR; Skinner DM
    Am J Med Technol; 1976 Jan; 42(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 1247023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of medical students to admission interviews.
    Koc T; Katona C; Rees PJ
    Med Educ; 2008 Mar; 42(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 18221267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The admission interview: the validity question.
    Killip DE; Fuller JL; Kerber PE
    J Dent Educ; 1979 Sep; 43(10 Pt 1):547-51. PubMed ID: 289678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.
    Hecker K; Donnon T; Fuentealba C; Hall D; Illanes O; Morck DW; Muelling C
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 19625664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.