These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. On the causes of compensation for coarticulation: evidence for phonological mediation. Mitterer H Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1227-40. PubMed ID: 17355045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Visemes observed by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing adult viewers. Owens E; Blazek B J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 4046579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Perceptual differences between vowels located in a limited phonetic space. Kewley-Port D; Atal BS J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 2708689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Different phase-stable relationships of the upper lip and jaw for production of vowels and diphthongs. Shaiman S; Porter RJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Dec; 90(6):3000-7. PubMed ID: 1787240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users. Donaldson GS; Kreft HA Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analytic study of the Tadoma method: further experiments with inexperienced observers. Reed CM; Doherty MJ; Braida LD; Durlach NI J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Jun; 25(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 7120961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Lip and jaw kinematics in bilabial stop consonant production. Löfqvist A; Gracco VL J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 40(4):877-93. PubMed ID: 9263951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Krishnan LA J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1228-46. PubMed ID: 1401512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Linear degrees of freedom in speech production: analysis of cineradio- and labio-film data and articulatory-acoustic modeling. Beautemps D; Badin P; Bailly G J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2165-80. PubMed ID: 11386568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Coarticulatory influences on the perceived height of nasal vowels. Krakow RA; Beddor PS; Goldstein LM; Fowler CA J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1146-58. PubMed ID: 3356819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Audiovisual perception of congruent and incongruent Dutch front vowels. Valkenier B; Duyne JY; Andringa TC; Baskent D J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1788-801. PubMed ID: 22992710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Production of bite-block vowels: acoustic equivalence by selective compensation. Gay T; Lindblom B; Lubker J J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Mar; 69(3):802-10. PubMed ID: 7240561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Recognition of vowels from information in fricatives: perceptual evidence of fricative-vowel coarticulation. Yeni-Komshian GH; Soli SD J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Oct; 70(4):966-75. PubMed ID: 7288043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can intrinsic vowel Fo be explained by source/tract coupling? Ewan WG J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):358-62. PubMed ID: 512198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Managing the distinctiveness of phonemic nasal vowels: articulatory evidence from Hindi. Shosted R; Carignan C; Rong P J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):455-65. PubMed ID: 22280607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]