593 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6876099)
1. Research on human subjects: Australian ethics committees take tentative steps.
Osborne LW
J Med Ethics; 1983 Jun; 9(2):66-8. PubMed ID: 6876099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The structure and functioning of ethical review committees.
Gutteridge F; Bankowski Z; Curran W; Dunne J
Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(20):1791-800. PubMed ID: 7178924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do Australian researchers accept committee review and conduct ethical research?
McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW
Soc Sci Med; 1992 Aug; 35(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 1519084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Hospital Ethics Committee.
Campbell JD; McEwin K
Med J Aust; 1981; 1(4):168-9. PubMed ID: 7231276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Experience of a human investigation committee in a Canadian medical school.
Heughan C; Barrowman JA; Murphy TM; Stuart SR
Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Apr; 130(8):991-6. PubMed ID: 6704862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical issues in the substantive and procedural aspects of research ethics review.
Meslin EM
Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 10125789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Human experimentation: issues before the hospital administrator.
Wielk CA
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1977; 22(3):4-25. PubMed ID: 12085914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reviewing the reviewers: a survey of institutional ethics committees in Australia.
McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW
Med J Aust; 1990 Mar; 152(6):289-96. PubMed ID: 2314331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How can an IRB avoid the use of obsolete consent forms?
Adkinson NF; Starklauf BL; Blake DA
IRB; 1983; 5(1):10. PubMed ID: 11649510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Review by a local medical research ethics committee of the conduct of approved research projects, by examination of patients' case notes, consent forms, and research records and by interview.
Smith T; Moore EJ; Tunstall-Pedoe H
BMJ; 1997 May; 314(7094):1588-90. PubMed ID: 9169403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health science research ethics: a critique.
Coburn D
Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 10125790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.
Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Jul; 7(3):38-49. PubMed ID: 22850142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The future of local ethical research committees.
Short D
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1987 Jan; 21(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 3820159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An assessment of institutional review committees in human experimentation.
Gray BH
Med Care; 1975 Apr; 13(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 1091788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 12-year audit of IRB decisions.
Grodin MA; Zaharoff BE; Kaminow PV
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1986 Mar; 12(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 3085041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical and human-rights issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity.
Capron AM
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1430-4. PubMed ID: 10228198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Institutional review boards.
Waggoner WC
Clin Dermatol; 1991; 9(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 1822404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Auckland hospital ethical committee: the first three years.
Richmond DE
N Z Med J; 1977 Jul; 86(591):10-2. PubMed ID: 271855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perspectives of protocol reviewers.
Moline ML; Aisen MW
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 11653327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Balancing the scales of public interest: medical research and privacy.
Cooper JE
Med J Aust; 1991 Oct; 155(8):556-60. PubMed ID: 1943938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
