These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Electrocutaneous spatial integration at suprathreshold levels: an additive neural model. Higashiyama A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):912-23. PubMed ID: 8409866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The identification of the direction of electrocutaneous stimulation along lineal multistimulator arrays. Sparks DW Percept Psychophys; 1979 Feb; 25(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 432102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual differences in sensitivity to transient electrocutaneous stimulation. Larkin WD; Reilly JP; Kittler LB IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1986 May; 33(5):495-504. PubMed ID: 3710505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrocutaneous stimulation I. The effects of stimulus parameters on absolute threshold. Girvin JP; Marks LE; Antunes JL; Quest DO; O'Keefe MD; Ning P; Dobelle WH Percept Psychophys; 1982 Dec; 32(6):524-8. PubMed ID: 7167349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation. Jelinek HF; McIntyre R Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A device for measuring tactile spatiotemporal sensitivity. Van Doren CL; Pelli DG; Verrillo RT J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jun; 81(6):1906-16. PubMed ID: 3611511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pattern identification and perceived stimulus quality as a function of stimulation waveform on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display. Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Mar; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12797720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display. Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14518790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial summation in the tactile sensory system: probability summation and neural integration. Gescheider GA; Güçlü B; Sexton JL; Karalunas S; Fontana A Somatosens Mot Res; 2005 Dec; 22(4):255-68. PubMed ID: 16503579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Localization of electrocutaneous stimuli on the fingers and forearm: effects of electrode configuration and body axis. Higashiyama A; Hayashi M Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8351181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of interstimulus interval on somatosensory point localization. Ylioja S; Pertovaara A; Koivisto J; Korvenoja A; Artchakov D; Carlson S Somatosens Mot Res; 2004 Mar; 21(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 15203968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of training on human tracking of electrocutaneous signals. Szeto AY; Chung YM Ann Biomed Eng; 1986; 14(4):369-81. PubMed ID: 3752640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial discrimination learning of electrocutaneous stimuli is influenced by the type of stimulation. Walter-Walsh K; Weiss T; Spohn D; Torma F; Miltner WH Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1281():47-57. PubMed ID: 19497308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]