These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 687931)
1. Audiometry in industry. Br Med J; 1978 Aug; 2(6134):380. PubMed ID: 687931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Noise-induced hearing loss: the family physician's role. Dobie RA Am Fam Physician; 1987 Dec; 36(6):141-8. PubMed ID: 3687673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occupational hearing loss. Al-Otaibi ST Saudi Med J; 2000 Jun; 21(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 11500698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Exposure to noise in the industry and its hygienic and guiding aspects]. Cosa M; Nicoli M; D'arca SU Nuovi Ann Ig Microbiol; 1976; 27(3):277-309. PubMed ID: 1026926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Standard threshold shift criteria. An investigation of the most reliable indicator of noise-induced hearing loss. Lane CL; Dobie RA; Crawford DR; Morgan MS J Occup Med; 1985 Jan; 27(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 3968596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of audiometry. J Soc Occup Med; 1973 Apr; 23(2):68-9. PubMed ID: 4283720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An investigation of the effects of occupational noise on hearing. In: Sensorineural hearing loss. Burns W; Robinson DW Ciba Found Symp; 1970; ():177-92. PubMed ID: 5210907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical analysis of the effectiveness of secondary prevention of occupational hearing loss. Hétu R J Occup Med; 1979 Apr; 21(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 438914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forward. The art of hearing conservation. Murphy WJ; Griest SE Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53 Suppl 2():S2-4. PubMed ID: 24564689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Our audiometric criteria for the prevention of occupational hearing disorders]. Tománek R; Sedlmajerová D Cesk Otolaryngol; 1983 Jul; 32(4):230-8. PubMed ID: 6627462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Noise-induced hearing loss and industrial audiometry. Somerville ET J R Coll Gen Pract; 1976 Oct; 26(171):770-80. PubMed ID: 1003386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Proceedings: IV. Industrial medicine. Mass screening of workers exposed to noise]. Humperdinck K; Surböck A Hefte Unfallheilkd; 1973; 114():193-7. PubMed ID: 4592919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Extended high frequency audiometry in the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss]. Somma G; Coppeta L; Magrini A; Parrella M; Cappelletti MC; Gardi S; Messina M; Bergamaschi A; G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2007; 29(3 Suppl):258-60. PubMed ID: 18409674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why 92 dB A? Hill VH Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1970; 31(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 5423226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The otologic referral criteria for occupational hearing conservation programs. Medical Aspects of noise Committee. American Council of Otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):635-6. PubMed ID: 471508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Dosimetric evaluation of noise and results of the audiometric examination of a selected group of workers in the refinery-petrochemical industry]. Latkowski B; Zalewski P; Sułkowski W; Puzio J Med Pr; 1987; 38(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 3451021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]