These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6881193)

  • 21. Setting up a system of pay for performance.
    Barros A
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1986 Nov; 18(11):39-45. PubMed ID: 10281018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Employee evaluation: it's a dirty job, but somebody's got to do it.
    Jensen J
    Grantsmanship Cent News; 1980; 8(4):36-45. PubMed ID: 10247628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Staff evaluation: an assessment of approaches.
    Calkin JD
    Health Care Superv; 1984 Jul; 2(4):68-78. PubMed ID: 10266420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
    Goodykoontz L
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance appraisals can improve efficiency.
    Korneluk G
    Can Doct; 1982 Sep; 48(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 10257835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Getting a handle on performance measurement.
    Scott S
    Adm Radiol; 1988 Mar; 7(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 10286583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Job evaluation systems.
    Dean J
    Top Health Care Financ; 1980; 6(3):75-80. PubMed ID: 7376186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A different approach to merit increases.
    Fleuter DL
    Pers J; 1979 Apr; 58(4):225-6, 262. PubMed ID: 10241466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Starting an assessment center the correct way.
    Byham WC
    Pers Adm; 1980 Feb; 25(2):27-32. PubMed ID: 10245723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How to use the positive reinforcing meeting.
    Umiker WO
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1987 May; 19(5):45-6. PubMed ID: 10281876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Policy and procedure manual. Employee anecdotal record.
    Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1987; 9(3):17-8. PubMed ID: 10284117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The field audit. Part B: The ride-along as a monitoring tool.
    Dernocoeur J; Dick T
    JEMS; 1988 Nov; 13(11):75-9. PubMed ID: 10290870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Assessment of the work efficiency of nurses].
    Vedenko BG; Sushchik LP; Vedenko LB
    Med Sestra; 1985 Sep; 44(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 3853062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficiency and effectiveness rating systems for field employees.
    Jacobs D
    J Environ Health; 1983; 46(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 10262854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Making the performance assessment process work for you.
    Lombardi DN
    Adm Radiol; 1988 Apr; 7(4):14-6, 18. PubMed ID: 10287386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An employee performance appraisal program.
    van Dassen D
    Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Dec; 56(12):36-9. PubMed ID: 510827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting (and preventing) differences between self and supervisory appraisals.
    Bernardin HJ; Abbott J
    Pers Adm; 1985 Jun; 30(6):151-2, 155-7. PubMed ID: 10271650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance appraisal blues: who should get the pink slip?
    Riordan J
    Respir Ther; 1981; 11(6):107-8, 110-11. PubMed ID: 10253943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Understanding, evaluating and improving nursing productivity.
    Williamson WJ; Johnston J
    Nurs Manage; 1988 May; 19(5):49-50, 52, 54. PubMed ID: 3368148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Staff evaluation of supervisors.
    Martin JA
    Spec Libr; 1979 Jan; 70(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 10241486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.