131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6883013)
1. Influences of delayed distraction on the modality effect in free recall.
Gathercole SE; Gregg VH; Gardiner JM
Br J Psychol; 1983 May; 74(Pt 2):223-32. PubMed ID: 6883013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The modality effect and echoic persistence.
Watkins OC; Watkins MJ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):251-78. PubMed ID: 6447188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
Beaman CP
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immediate serial recall of mixed-modality lists.
Greene RL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 2522515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.
Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modality effects in delayed free recall and recognition: visual is better than auditory.
Penney CG
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Aug; 41(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 2798920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repetition blindness: the effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement.
Kanwisher N; Potter MC
Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 2927309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Serial recall of two-voice lists: implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects.
Greene RL
Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 2017031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enumeration produces poor primacy for tactile presentation relative to visual and auditory presentation as the only modality effect.
Gibbons JA; Velkey AJ; Partin KT
Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):795-810. PubMed ID: 18712201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of recall procedures on the modality effect with numbers and enumerated stimuli.
Gibbons JA; Velkey AK; Partin KT
J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):84-104. PubMed ID: 18318410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modalities of memory: is reading lips like hearing voices?
Maidment DW; Macken B; Jones DM
Cognition; 2013 Dec; 129(3):471-93. PubMed ID: 24041834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recency and suffix effects in serial recall of musical stimuli.
Greene RL; Samuel AG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Oct; 12(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 2945898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phonological short-term store and the nature of the recency effect: evidence from neuropsychology.
Vallar G; Papagano C
Brain Cogn; 1986 Oct; 5(4):428-42. PubMed ID: 3580186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for auditory temporal distinctiveness: modality effects in order and frequency judgments.
Glenberg AM; Fernandez A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):728-39. PubMed ID: 2972805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unusual modality effects in less-skilled readers.
Penney CG; Godsell A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 9949714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why do participants initiate free recall of short lists of words with the first list item? Toward a general episodic memory explanation.
Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1551-67. PubMed ID: 24933695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Further evidence of interference between lipreading and auditory recency.
Gardiner JM; Gathercole SE; Gregg VH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1983 Apr; 9(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 6222148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual organization and precategorical acoustic storage.
Frankish C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):469-479. PubMed ID: 2524546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of same-modality interference on immediate serial recall of auditory and visual information.
Turner ML; Johnson SK; McNamara DS; Engle RW
J Gen Psychol; 1992 Jul; 119(3):247-63. PubMed ID: 1447561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
