These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6883070)

  • 1. Central auditory processing. I. Ear dominance--a perceptual or an attentional asymmetry?
    Gregory AH; Efron R; Divenyi PL; Yund EW
    Brain Lang; 1983 Jul; 19(2):225-36. PubMed ID: 6883070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binaural versus monaural loudness: supersummation of tone partially masked by noise.
    Marks LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 3819169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binaural and temporal integration of the loudness of tones and noises.
    Algom D; Rubin A; Cohen-Raz L
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 2762103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probability distributions of interaural phase and level differences in binaural detection stimuli.
    Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1927-32. PubMed ID: 1960286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex differences in performance and hemispheric organization for a nonverbal auditory task.
    McRoberts GW; Sanders B
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Feb; 51(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 1549430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Central auditory processing. IV. Ear dominance--spatial and temporal complexity.
    Efron R; Koss B; Yund EW
    Brain Lang; 1983 Jul; 19(2):264-82. PubMed ID: 6883073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A central spectrum theory of binaural processing. Evidence from dichotic pitch.
    Raatgever J; Bilsen FA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):429-41. PubMed ID: 3745675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An auditory Stroop effect for pitch, loudness, and time.
    Morgan AL; Brandt JF
    Brain Lang; 1989 May; 36(4):592-603. PubMed ID: 2720372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dichotic, diotic, and monaural summation of loudness: a comprehensive analysis of composition and psychophysical functions.
    Algom D; Ben-Aharon B; Cohen-Raz L
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Dec; 46(6):567-78. PubMed ID: 2587186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Range and regression, loudness scales, and loudness processing: toward a context-bound psychophysics.
    Algom D; Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):706-27. PubMed ID: 2148587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correspondence between brain ERP and behavioral asymmetries in a dichotic complex tone test.
    Tenke CE; Bruder GE; Towey JP; Leite P; Sidtis JJ
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Jan; 30(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 8416063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Central auditory processing. V. Ear advantages for acoustic stimuli in baboons.
    Pohl P
    Brain Lang; 1983 Sep; 20(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 6626944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central auditory processing. II. Effects of anterior temporal lobectomy.
    Efron R; Crandall PH
    Brain Lang; 1983 Jul; 19(2):237-53. PubMed ID: 6883071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.
    Foundas AL; Corey DM; Hurley MM; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Dec; 17(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 15622019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Central auditory processing. VI. Detecting ear dominance by evoked potentials.
    Efron R; Snyder E; Yund EW; Martin F
    Brain Lang; 1983 Sep; 20(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 6626945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory filter bandwidths in binaural and monaural listening conditions.
    Kollmeier B; Holube I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1889-901. PubMed ID: 1401533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.
    Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual degradation due to signal alteration: implications for auditory pattern processing.
    Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):392-403. PubMed ID: 1830083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural forward and backward masking: evidence for sluggishness in binaural detection.
    Kollmeier B; Gilkey RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1709-19. PubMed ID: 2341675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The problem of front-back localization in binaural hearing.
    Weinrich S
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():135-45. PubMed ID: 6955921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.