These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6885087)

  • 1. An exact linkage test for multiple case families.
    Morton NE
    Hum Hered; 1983; 33(4):244-9. PubMed ID: 6885087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association mapping of complex diseases in linked regions: estimation of genetic effects and feasibility of testing rare variants.
    Wang WY; Cordell HJ; Todd JA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 12508254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 1: Optimality criteria for affected sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Hum Hered; 1994; 44(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8163290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating genetic heterogeneity in complex disorders.
    Pal DK; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(4):216-26. PubMed ID: 12435885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A robust method for the detection of linkage in familial disease.
    Fishman PM; Suarez B; Hodge SE; Reich T
    Am J Hum Genet; 1978 May; 30(3):308-21. PubMed ID: 677128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tests of linkage and heterogeneity in Mendelian diseases using identity by descent scores.
    Chakravarti A; Badner JA; Li CC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(4):255-66. PubMed ID: 3666434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note on linkage analysis with affected sib triplets.
    Knapp M
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 15802918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
    Thomson G; Motro U
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A medico-genetic description of inhabitants of two regions of the Kransnodar Krai].
    Mamedova RA; Kadoshnikova MIu; Galkina VA; Klebnikova OB; Mikhaĭlova LK; Rudenskaia GE; Ginter EK
    Genetika; 1999 Jan; 35(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 10330614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linkage and mode of inheritance in complex traits.
    Risch N; Claus E; Giuffra L
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 329():183-8. PubMed ID: 2622951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis I: use of the mean statistic for affected sib pairs.
    Guo X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 10642424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Affected-sib-pair data can be used to distinguish two-locus heterogeneity from two-locus epistasis.
    Cordell HJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Dec; 73(6):1468-71; author reply 1471-3. PubMed ID: 14655099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power of the linkage test for a heterogeneous disorder due to two independent inherited causes: a simulation study.
    Martinez M; Goldin LR
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(3):219-30. PubMed ID: 2370000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Further tests of nonrandom segregation with special reference to linkage.
    Majumder PP
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 3692136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robustness of inference on measured covariates to misspecification of genetic random effects in family studies.
    Pfeiffer RM; Hildesheim A; Gail MH; Pee D; Chen CJ; Goldstein AM; Diehl SR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 12508252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effect of genetic structure on hereditary diseases in Russian populations].
    Ginter EK
    Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 1993; (9):23-7. PubMed ID: 7510178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the power of linkage detection by the transmission disequilibrium test and the identity-by-descent test.
    Clerget-Darpoux F; Babron MC; Bickeböller H
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 8787977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linkage analysis with fixed prevalence: application to simulated data.
    Rice J; Suarez BK; Hampe CL; Neuman R
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 329():165-70. PubMed ID: 2622947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.