These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6885390)

  • 1. Effect of temperature changes in acrylic cement on prosthetic implant surgery. An investigation into the relationship between quantity and temperature changes at different levels on loosening of the implant.
    Calderale PM; Pipino F
    Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1983 Mar; 9(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 6885390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness.
    Terrier A; Büchler P; Farron A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Aug; 20(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 15961203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
    Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The temperature problem at the bone-acrylic cement interface of the total hip replacement.
    DiPisa JA; Sih GS; Berman AT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1976; (121):95-8. PubMed ID: 991524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
    Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic creep behavior of acrylic bone cement.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 May; 29(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 7622542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the effects of implant materials and designs on thermal necrosis of bone in cemented hip arthroplasty.
    Li C; Kotha S; Mason J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2003; 13(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 14646056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Properties and applications of acrylic bone cement.
    Greenwald AS
    Bull Hosp Joint Dis; 1979; 40():72-83. PubMed ID: 554705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shrinkage of centrifuged cement.
    Hamilton HW; Cooper DF; Fels M
    Orthop Rev; 1988 Jan; 17(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 3174195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
    Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
    Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cemented fixation with PMMA or Bis-GMA resin hydroxyapatite cement: effect of implant surface roughness.
    Walsh WR; Svehla MJ; Russell J; Saito M; Nakashima T; Gillies RM; Bruce W; Hori R
    Biomaterials; 2004 Sep; 25(20):4929-34. PubMed ID: 15109853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite element temperature analysis of a total hip replacement and measurement of PMMA curing temperatures.
    Swenson LW; Schurman DJ; Piziali Rl
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Jan; 15(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 7348707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Hip prosthetic stem biological fixation by compound bone-cement].
    Yang X
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1993 Jul; 73(7):406-9, 447. PubMed ID: 8293342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.