213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6885893)
1. Computed tomography in staging primary uterine cervical carcinoma.
Poon PY
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Jun; 34(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 6885893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma.
Walsh JW; Goplerud DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Nov; 137(5):997-1003. PubMed ID: 6975028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interobserver variability of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging in cervical cancer.
Tummers P; Gerestein K; Mens JW; Verstraelen H; van Doorn H
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jun; 23(5):890-4. PubMed ID: 23640293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revisiting the role of computerized tomographic scan and cystoscopy for detecting bladder invasion in the revised FIGO staging system for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Sharma DN; Thulkar S; Goyal S; Shukla NK; Kumar S; Rath GK; Julka PK; Saini G; Bahl A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Apr; 20(3):368-72. PubMed ID: 20375799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing disease extent in women with bulky or clinically evident metastatic cervical cancer: yield of pretreatment studies.
Massad LS; Calvello C; Gilkey SH; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Mar; 76(3):383-7. PubMed ID: 10684715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Computed tomography in the diagnosis of cervical cancer].
Kolesnikova EK
Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1986 Nov; (11):18-23. PubMed ID: 2949642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. CT and ultra low field (0.02 T) MR imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Varpula M; Kilholma P; Klemi P
Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 8011386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomography in advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Thorvinger B; Hauksson A; Samuelsson L; Tropé C
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(5):423-6. PubMed ID: 6507136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.
Ho CM; Chien TY; Jeng CM; Tsang YM; Shih BY; Chang SC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 91(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 1362678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Synchronous gynecologic cancer and the use of imaging for diagnosis.
Boaventura CS; Galvão JL; Soares GM; Bitencourt AG; Chojniak R; Bringel SL; Brot LD
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2016 Apr; 62(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 27167539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evaluation of transrectal radial ultrasonography on parametrial infiltration in untreated cervical carcinoma for more accurate staging.
Yamamoto K; Kitao M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 41(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 2664041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of computed tomography (CT) scan in staging of cervical carcinoma.
Prasad TV; Thulkar S; Hari S; Sharma DN; Kumar S
Indian J Med Res; 2014 May; 139(5):714-9. PubMed ID: 25027081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomographic evaluation of carcinoma of the cervix.
Whitley NO; Brenner DE; Francis A; Villa Santa U; Aisner J; Wiernik PH; Whitley J
Radiology; 1982 Feb; 142(2):439-46. PubMed ID: 7054834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumor heterogeneity of FIGO stage III carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Kim YB; Lee IJ; Kim SY; Kim JW; Yoon HI; Kim SW; Kim S; Kim YT; Suh CO; Kim GE
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec; 75(5):1323-8. PubMed ID: 19467800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early-stage cervical cancer: agreement between ultrasound and histopathological findings with regard to tumor size and extent of local disease.
Gaurilcikas A; Vaitkiene D; Cizauskas A; Inciura A; Svedas E; Maciuleviciene R; Di Legge A; Ferrandina G; Testa AC; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):707-15. PubMed ID: 21538643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The identification of a tumor of the cervix on PET/CT with bladder filling and emptying.
Wang KB; Tu DG; Huang SS
Clin Nucl Med; 2009 May; 34(5):296-7. PubMed ID: 19387208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of cystoscopy and intravenous urography after magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma.
Chung H; Ahn HS; Kim YS; Lee EJ; Ryu HS; Chang KH; Kim SJ
Yonsei Med J; 2001 Oct; 42(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 11675681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]