These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6886197)
1. Susceptibility to intraspeech spread of masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Hannley M; Dorman MF J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 6886197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraspeech spread of masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Summers V; Leek MR J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2866-76. PubMed ID: 9165738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping. Mackersie CL J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of synthetic /bdg/ by hearing-impaired listeners under monotic and dichotic formant presentation. Van de Grift Turek S; Dorman MF; Franks JR; Summerfield Q J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Mar; 67(3):1031-40. PubMed ID: 7358910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech. Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154920. PubMed ID: 27144601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Rankovic CM J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation. Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH; Roush PA Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Upward spread of masking, hearing loss, and speech recognition in young and elderly listeners. Klein AJ; Mills JH; Adkins WY J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1266-71. PubMed ID: 2324393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Excess masking among listeners with a sensorineural hearing loss. Gagné JP J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jun; 83(6):2311-21. PubMed ID: 3411023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the first formant on the recognition of voiced stop consonants by hearing-impaired listeners. Dorman MF; Lindholm JM; Hannley MT J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 2931555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech competition effects on synthetic stop-vowel perception by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Gordon-Salant SM; Wightman FL J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 May; 73(5):1756-65. PubMed ID: 6223058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise. Hedrick MS; Younger MS J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of hearing impairment on the identification of speech that is modulated synchronously or asynchronously across frequency. Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):955-62. PubMed ID: 18247898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perception of second-formant transitions by hearing-impaired persons. Van Tasell DJ Ear Hear; 1980; 1(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 7390071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation, and relative amplitude. Arehart KH; Rossi-Katz J; Swensson-Prutsman J J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):236-52. PubMed ID: 15938067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. Dubno JR; Schaefer AB J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Upward spread of masking in normal and abnormal ears]. Picard M; Couture-Metz F Audiology; 1985; 24(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 3994593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]