These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6887109)

  • 1. A life table analysis technique for the evaluation of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Bull MJ
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1983 Jul; 33(252):403-7. PubMed ID: 6887109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Health risks of intrauterine contraception (author's transl)].
    Keith LG; Berger GS; Edelman DA
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Jun; 11(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 12338737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Nova-T 200 intrauterine contraceptive device: a 12 year study.
    Baeyertz JD; Hartfield VJ
    N Z Med J; 1997 May; 110(1043):169-71. PubMed ID: 9196502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Florida's experience with an intrauterine device for the nulliparous patients.
    Caraway AF
    J Reprod Med; 1975 Sep; 15(3):114-6. PubMed ID: 1214252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pelvic inflammatory disease among women using copper IUDs, Progestasert, oral contraceptive pills or vaginal contraceptive pills: a 4-year prospective investigation.
    Larsson B; Rodau S; Patek E
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Jul; 2(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 12278910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A reanalysis of the Cu-7 intrauterine contraceptive device clinical trial and the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease: a paradigm for assessing intrauterine contraceptive device safety.
    Roy S; Azen C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1606-13; discussion 1613-6. PubMed ID: 8203417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation and follow-up on 3,829 IUD procedures.
    Hindle WH
    Trans Pac Coast Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1978; 45():105-10. PubMed ID: 715859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Return to fertility in nulliparous and parous women after removal of the GyneFix intrauterine contraceptive system.
    Delbarge W; Bátár I; Bafort M; Bonnivert J; Colmant C; Dhont M; Fonzé V; Gevers R; Janssens D; Lavalley P; Salmin E; Degueldre M; Vrijens M; Van Kets H; Wildemeersch D
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Mar; 7(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12041861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Steroid intra-uterine contraception: progesterone-releasing devices. II. Insertion, clinical problems and contraceptive dependability].
    Custo GM; Cosmi EV
    Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1984; 12(4):331-43. PubMed ID: 12340352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term use of intrauterine devices.
    Novak MK; Andolsek L; Balogh SA; Waszak CS
    IPPF Med Bull; 1988 Feb; 22(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12281431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Gravigard intrauterine copper contraceptive device.
    Macourt DC
    Med J Aust; 1974 May; 1(18):717-8. PubMed ID: 4851932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pelvic abscess in intrauterine device users.
    Tanir HM; Hassa H; Ozalp S; Kaya M; Oge T
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2005 Mar; 10(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 16036293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An audit of intrauterine device usage and outcome in general practice.
    Presley AP
    Practitioner; 1980 Oct; 224(1348):1089-91. PubMed ID: 7220438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The TCu380 IUD: initial international experimental results with the latest "T" family IUD].
    Elia D; Belaisch J
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1985 Sep; 13(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 12267501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrauterine devices.
    Mccarthy TG; Ratnam SS
    Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Oct; 4(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 12345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
    Forrest JD
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrauterine devices (IUDs) and their complications (clinical evaluation of 2013 women with IUD in-situ).
    Ayhan A; Ozalp S; Aslan A
    Acta Reprod Turc; 1982 Oct; 4(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 12267258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intrauterine devices.
    Gromko L
    Nurse Pract; 1980; 5(4):17,20-1, passim. PubMed ID: 7413110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.