These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 688751)

  • 1. A comparative controlled trial in rural Thailand of three intrauterine devices.
    Somboonsuk A; Israngkum C; Siriwongse T; Dusitsin N; Onthuam Y; Chaudhury RR; Fuchs F; Grossman R; Gray R
    Contraception; 1978 Aug; 18(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 688751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of adding copper onto Lippes Loop IUDs: results from a ten-year study in Yugoslavia.
    Randic L; Haller H; Perovic M; Farr G
    Contraception; 1991 Mar; 43(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2036794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: randomized study.
    Tatum HJ; Beltran RS; Ramos R; Van Kets H; Sivin I; Schmidt FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Nov; 175(5):1231-5. PubMed ID: 8942493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized comparison of the Ypsilon-Y and Lippes loop D intrauterine devices in parous women.
    Brenner PF; Roy S; Mishell DR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Mar; 51(3):327-9. PubMed ID: 628535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of Lippes loop and Delta loop intrauterine devices in early postpartum.
    Chompootaweep S; Reinprayoon D; Virutamasen P; Somboonsuk A; Dusitsin N
    Contraception; 1983 Nov; 28(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 6673899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of Lippes Loop and CuT inserted in immediate post-abortal period.
    Chowdhury NN; Mandal GS; Das M
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1979 Apr; 29(2):234-44. PubMed ID: 12156558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrauterine devices.
    Mccarthy TG; Ratnam SS
    Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Oct; 4(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 12345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postpartum and postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Martorella LA; Esposito JM
    J Reprod Med; 1975 Apr; 14(4):178-81. PubMed ID: 1142352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A collaborative study of the progesterone intrauterine device (Progestasert). The World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Implantation.
    Newton J; Szontagh F; Lebech P; Rowe P
    Contraception; 1979 Jun; 19(6):575-89. PubMed ID: 487808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical evaluation of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Mukherjee SN; Mukherjee S
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1968 Apr; 18(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 12156551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Return of fertility after discontinuation of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and intra-uterine devices in Northern Thailand.
    Pardthaisong T; Gray RH; McDaniel EB
    Lancet; 1980 Mar; 1(8167):509-12. PubMed ID: 6102234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of copper T-200 with Lippes loop as a contraceptive device.
    Wright EA; Aisien OA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Jun; 29(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 2568294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The introduction of postpartum intrauterine devices in the People's Republic of China.
    Wen ZS; Lin L; Laufe LE; Dixon B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1983 Apr; 21(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 6136435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuation rate surveys in Thailand: results and policy implications 1971-1981.
    J Thai Assoc Volunt Steriliz; 1982 Dec; ():37-58. PubMed ID: 12265676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting intrauterine contraceptive device performance. I. Endometrial cavity length.
    Hasson HM; Berger GS; Edelman DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Dec; 126(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 998687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C).
    Fakhr MM; Fakhr DM; Hassan AA; Nasser NM
    Popul Sci; 1988; 8():39-53. PubMed ID: 12316112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrauterine devices (IUDs) and their complications (clinical evaluation of 2013 women with IUD in-situ).
    Ayhan A; Ozalp S; Aslan A
    Acta Reprod Turc; 1982 Oct; 4(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 12267258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience with Lippes loop and copper-T intrauterine devices in rural Bangladesh.
    Bhatia S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1982 Jun; 20(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 6127242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Copper T 220C: a new long-acting copper intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Cooper DL; Millen AK; Mishell DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jan; 124(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 1247047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.