These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6888359)

  • 1. Signal-to-noise ratio considerations in radiographic imaging.
    Chakraborty DP; Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(4):467-9. PubMed ID: 6888359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems.
    Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 3974523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noise transfer in screen-film subtraction radiography.
    Shaw A; Moores BM
    Phys Med Biol; 1985 Mar; 30(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 3885267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physical evaluation of computed radiography as a mammographic X-ray imaging system.
    Workman A; Cowen AR; Brettle DS
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):988-96. PubMed ID: 8000844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Wiener spectra of roentgen film-screen combinations].
    Mirandé W; Hoeschen D
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Mar; 38(3):81-4. PubMed ID: 3992138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiographic mottle: a comprehensive theory.
    Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(5):656-67. PubMed ID: 7155067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physical evaluation of prototype high-performance anti-scatter grids: potential for improved digital radiographic image quality.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):N37-42. PubMed ID: 19098352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantum noise in detectors.
    Rimkus D; Baily NA
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(4):470-1. PubMed ID: 6888360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of a contrast-detail test object in the optimization of optical density in mammography.
    Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):277-82. PubMed ID: 7735767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Complex evaluation of film mammographic imaging systems. 2. Comparison of 18 systems using a signal-noise matrix].
    Friedrich M; Weskamp P
    Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 6429790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scanned-projection digital mammography.
    Nishikawa RM; Mawdsley GE; Fenster A; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(5):717-27. PubMed ID: 3683300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical performance measures of radiographic imaging systems.
    Workman A; Brettle DS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9442599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screen-film mammographic technique for breast cancer screening.
    Stanton L; Day JL; Villafana T; Miller CH; Lightfoot DA
    Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 3562829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Film-screen digital radiography.
    Schwenker RP; Eger H
    Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Sensitometry of Mammographic Screen-film System Using Bootstrap Aluminum Step-Wedge.].
    Abe S; Imada R; Terauchi T; Fujisaki T; Monma M; Nishimura K; Saitoh H; Mochizuki Y
    Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 16479054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.