These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6888361)

  • 41. Comparison of the TL responses of two different preparations of LiF:Mg,Cu,P irradiated by photons of various energies.
    González PR; Furetta C; Azorín J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2007 Mar; 65(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 17085055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sensitivity enhancement effects in the thermoluminescence of LiF TLD-100 at radiation doses below 10 Gy.
    Folkard M; Roper MJ; Michael BD
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Jun; 32(6):769-73. PubMed ID: 3615579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparative study of LiF:Mg,Cu,Na,Si and Li2B4O7:Cu,Ag,P TL detectors.
    Miljanić S; Ranogajec-Komor M; Knezević Z; Stuhec M; Prokić M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):191-6. PubMed ID: 16709712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Performance of Harshaw TLD-100H two-element Dosemeter.
    Luo LZ; Rotunda JE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):324-30. PubMed ID: 16644944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.
    Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The application of CaSO4:Dy (TLD-900) to diagnostic x-ray exposures.
    Niroomand-Rad A; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(5):691-4. PubMed ID: 6646078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Long-term fade study of the DT-702 LiF: Mg,Cu,P TLD.
    Delzer JA; Hawley JR; Romanyukha A; Nemmers S; Selwyn R; Benevides LA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 18621919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Thermal quenching by phototransfer in LiF TLD-100.
    Kathuria SP; Sunta CM
    Phys Med Biol; 1981 Jul; 26(4):707-10. PubMed ID: 7255550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sensitivity of LiF thermoluminescent dosemeters to 6-18 keV photons.
    Ahmed AB; Barber DE
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Mar; 34(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 2928389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dependence of TLD thermoluminescence yield on absorbed dose in a thermal neutron field.
    Gambarini G; Roy MS
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1997; 48(10-12):1467-75. PubMed ID: 9463872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Application of whole-body personal TL dosemeters in mixed field beta-gamma radiation.
    Ciupek K; Aksamit D; Wołoszczuk K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Nov; 162(1-2):20-3. PubMed ID: 25009188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Light sensitivity of LiF thermoluminescent dosimeters.
    Freeswick DC; Shambon A
    Health Phys; 1970 Jul; 19(1):65. PubMed ID: 5513547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An example of abnormal glow curves identification in personnel thermoluminescent dosimetry.
    Osorio Piniella V; Stadtmann H; Lankmayr E
    J Biochem Biophys Methods; 2002; 53(1-3):117-22. PubMed ID: 12406593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Optimisation of the readout parameters when evaluating thermal neutron doses by TL dosimetry with LiF:Mg,Ti.
    German U; Weinstein M; Abraham A; Alfassi ZB
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):532-5. PubMed ID: 17513859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti.
    Edwards CR; Mountford PJ; Green S; Palethorpe JE; Moloney AJ
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):543-7. PubMed ID: 15900061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. OSL and TL response characterization of LiF:MG,Ti microdosimeters to be applied to VMAT quality assurance.
    Bravim A; Sakuraba RK; Cruz JC; Campos LL
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2015 Nov; 105():299-302. PubMed ID: 26386504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of the effects of exposure to light in Harshaw LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
    Baker ST; Gilvin PJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):258-60. PubMed ID: 16980318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. APPLICATION OF PTTL METHOD FOR DOSE REASSESSMENT IN EXTREMITY DOSIMETRY.
    Sas-Bieniarz A; Budzanowski M; Bubak A; Kopeć R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):204-7. PubMed ID: 27143792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinical use of carbon-loaded thermoluminescent dosimeters for skin dose determination.
    Ostwald PM; Kron T; Hamilton CS; Denham JW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Nov; 33(4):943-50. PubMed ID: 7591907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. IAEA/WHO 60Co teletherapy dosimetry service using mailed LiF dosimeters. A survey of results obtained during 1975-1982.
    Boyd AW; Eisenlohr HH
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(4):491-2. PubMed ID: 6888365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.