106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6890510)
1. Evaluation of the cutaneous-irritation potential of 56 compounds.
Guillot JP; Gonnet JF; Clement C; Caillard L; Truhaut R
Food Chem Toxicol; 1982 Oct; 20(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 6890510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the ocular-irritation potential of 56 compounds.
Guillot JP; Gonnet JF; Clement C; Caillard L; Truhaut R
Food Chem Toxicol; 1982 Oct; 20(5):573-82. PubMed ID: 6890511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An eye irritation test protocol and an evaluation and classification system.
Gupta KC; Chambers WA; Green S; Hill RN; Hurley PM; Lambert LA; Liu PT; Lowther DK; Seabaugh VM; Springer JA
Food Chem Toxicol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 8449456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of modified methods for determining skin irritation.
Nixon GA; Bannan EA; Gaynor TW; Johnston DH; Griffith JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1990 Oct; 12(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 2259754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.
Graham JC; Wilt N; Costin GE; Villano C; Bader J; Krawiec L; Sly E; Gould J
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 37(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 30035615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative assessment of 24-hr primary skin irritation test and human patch test data with in vitro skin irritation tests according to OECD Test Guideline 439 (for quasi-drugs in Japan).
Sugiyama M; Akita M; Alépée N; Fujishiro M; Hagino S; Handa Y; Ikeda H; Imai N; Jitsukawa S; Katoh M; Kurihara K; Kyotani D; Nomura S; Okamoto Y; Okumura H; Omori T; Sugibayashi K; Todo H; Toyoda A; Ohno Y
J Toxicol Sci; 2018; 43(12):751-768. PubMed ID: 30518713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: report on the validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test.
Spielmann H; Hoffmann S; Liebsch M; Botham P; Fentem JH; Eskes C; Roguet R; Cotovio J; Cole T; Worth A; Heylings J; Jones P; Robles C; Kandárová H; Gamer A; Remmele M; Curren R; Raabe H; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V
Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):559-601. PubMed ID: 18186667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of fibrin-based dermal-epidermal organotypic cultures for in vitro skin corrosion and irritation testing of chemicals according to OECD TG 431 and 439.
Morales M; Pérez D; Correa L; Restrepo L
Toxicol In Vitro; 2016 Oct; 36():89-96. PubMed ID: 27448499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of methods chosen by the Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR) for evaluating sensitizing potential in the albino guinea-pig.
Guillot JP; Gonnet JF; Clément C; Faccini JM
Food Chem Toxicol; 1983 Dec; 21(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 6686585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acute irritation tests in risk assessment.
Schlatter C; Reinhardt CA
Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 4040056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: selection of test chemicals.
Eskes C; Cole T; Hoffmann S; Worth A; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V
Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):603-19. PubMed ID: 18186668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distribution of eye irritation scores of industrial chemicals.
Kobel W; Gfeller W
Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):311-2. PubMed ID: 4040082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CON4EI: CONsortium for in vitro Eye Irritation testing strategy - EpiOcular™ time-to-toxicity (EpiOcular ET-50) protocols for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals.
Kandarova H; Letasiova S; Adriaens E; Guest R; Willoughby JA; Drzewiecka A; Gruszka K; Alépée N; Verstraelen S; Van Rompay AR
Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Jun; 49():34-52. PubMed ID: 28866024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Harmonization of thresholds for primary skin irritation from results of human repeated insult patch tests and laboratory animal skin irritation tests.
Tardiff RG; Hubner RP; Graves CG
J Appl Toxicol; 2003; 23(4):279-81. PubMed ID: 12884413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Establishment and evaluation of immortalized human epidermal keratinocytes for an alternative skin irritation test.
Kim CW; Kim CD; Choi KC
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2017; 88(Pt 2):130-139. PubMed ID: 28827132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved procedures for in vitro skin irritation testing of sticky and greasy natural botanicals.
Molinari J; Eskes C; Andres E; Remoué N; Sá-Rocha VM; Hurtado SP; Barrichello C
Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Feb; 27(1):441-50. PubMed ID: 22906570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of ocular irritancy potential from dermal irritation test results.
Williams SJ
Food Chem Toxicol; 1984 Feb; 22(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 6538165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CON4EI: Selection of the reference chemicals for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals.
Adriaens E; Alépée N; Kandarova H; Drzewieckac A; Gruszka K; Guest R; Willoughby JA; Verstraelen S; Van Rompay AR
Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Oct; 44():44-48. PubMed ID: 28595836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Methodology for the evaluation of cutaneous toxicity. I. Percutaneous toxicity-irritation tests].
Dutertre-Catella H; Phu-Lich N; Truhaut R
Food Cosmet Toxicol; 1978 Apr; 16(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 352863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a standardized testing procedure for assessing the irritation potential of occupational skin cleansers.
Elsner P; Seyfarth F; Antonov D; John SM; Diepgen T; Schliemann S
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Mar; 70(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 24588368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
