501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6890977)
1. Utilization and quality control peer review organizations--a rose by any other name . . . ?
Berg RN
J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Nov; 71(11):793-6. PubMed ID: 6890977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute.
Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB
Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The ultimate litmus test.
Moran T
Tex Med; 1998 Sep; 94(9):41-3. PubMed ID: 9747143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Physician peer review in New Jersey.
Dwyer WA
N J Med; 1989 Feb; 86(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 2710420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review, hearing requirements, and antitrust: maximizing Federal Health Care Quality Improvement Act compliance and immunity.
Snelson EA
J Med Assoc Ga; 1992 Sep; 81(9):495-7. PubMed ID: 1402428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Update: PSRO transmittal. Peer review by health care practitioners other than physicians.
Rogers J
Med Rec News; 1977 Apr; 48(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 10305612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review: indictment, trial and beyond.
Hudson JD; Ravreby MD
Iowa Med; 1989 Dec; 79(12):580-2. PubMed ID: 2689389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review shifts focus to patterns of care.
Carlson B
Indiana Med; 1994; 87(6):458-61. PubMed ID: 7806858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Private review-its impact on health care and physicians.
Sandrick KM
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Apr; 8(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 6806740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organizations; imposition of sanctions on health care practitioners and providers of health care services--HCFA. Proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1984 Apr; 49(76):15233-40. PubMed ID: 10299475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: new PRO contracts for all states and territories and the District of Columbia--HCFA. Notice.
Fed Regist; 1993 Mar; 58(39):12042-7. PubMed ID: 10124395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer Review Organizations: the future agenda. A report of the American Medical Peer Review Association's Task Force on Peer Review Organization Implementation.
Qual Assur Util Rev; 1986 Aug; 1(3):83-90. PubMed ID: 2980883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Utilization management and quality assurance: developing legal tensions.
Gosfield AG
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):15-23. PubMed ID: 10302313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of quality of care in the United States].
Durand-Zaleski I; Audet AM; Greenfield S; Jolly D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1991; 39(5):467-76. PubMed ID: 1775700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organizations--imposition of sanctions on health care practitioners and providers of health care services--HCFA. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15335-47. PubMed ID: 10299990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. WIPRO clarifies changes to quality review process.
Wis Med J; 1993 Aug; 92(8):479. PubMed ID: 8237040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Working with the PRO. Foundation for Health Care Evaluation.
Minn Med; 1989 May; 72(5):287-9. PubMed ID: 2659957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: revised scopes of work for Delaware, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Nevada, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Washington, and Wyoming--HCFA. Final notice.
Fed Regist; 1991 Sep; 56(171):43790-3. PubMed ID: 10113846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in utilization management: legal implications for health records administration.
Gosfield AG
Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Nov; 12(2):22-33. PubMed ID: 10114763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How physicians can avoid problems with the PRO.
Ponder S
Colo Med; 1989 Dec; 86(18):387-8. PubMed ID: 2689059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
