These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6892656)
1. Risk versus benefits: the future of food safety. The new metaphysics. Miller SA Nutr Rev; 1980 Jan; 38(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 6892656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk versus benefits: the future of food safety. Risk and responsibility. Wodicka VO Nutr Rev; 1980 Jan; 38(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 6892655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Food safety: are our laws too lenient? Too strict? Hutt PB Am Med News; 1980 Mar; 23(11):suppl 3-4, 10. PubMed ID: 10246040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Continuing the evolution of food safety. Roberts HR Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1982 Mar; 2(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 7186161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Toxicology and food safety regulations. Miller SA Arch Toxicol; 1987; 60(1-3):212-6. PubMed ID: 3304209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk versus benefits: the future of food safety. The nature of benefits. Darby WJ Nutr Rev; 1980 Jan; 38(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 6892654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Food agencies and food standards: the future regulatory mechanism for the food trade? James WP Nutrition; 2000; 16(7-8):631-3. PubMed ID: 10906578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Food technology. A primer for physicians. Levine AS; Labuza TP; Morley JE N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(10):628-34. PubMed ID: 3883163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The 1996 Food Quality Protection Act--an evolution or a revolution for toxicology and risk assessment? McCarthy JF Toxicol Pathol; 1998; 26(6):828-9. PubMed ID: 9864102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Proposed rules issued for bioengineered foods. Formanek R FDA Consum; 2001; 35(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 11444252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. FDA's consideration of Codex Alimentarius standards in light of international trade agreements. Sikes L Food Drug Law J; 1998; 53(2):327-35. PubMed ID: 10346688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Report calls for overhaul of US food safety system. Benac N CMAJ; 2010 Sep; 182(12):1288-90. PubMed ID: 20696804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. IOM recommends federal regulation over the salt content of certain foods. Mitka M JAMA; 2010 Jun; 303(22):2238-40. PubMed ID: 20530770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Generally recognized as safe (GRAS): history and description. Burdock GA; Carabin IG Toxicol Lett; 2004 Apr; 150(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 15068820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Agricultural and food biotechnology. Bruhn C; Earl R; J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Feb; 106(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 16442880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The danger in food safety policies. Morrison AB Can Med Assoc J; 1978 Sep; 119(5):420,422. PubMed ID: 688145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of risk assessment in food safety policy. Scheuplein RJ Basic Life Sci; 1986; 38():563-71. PubMed ID: 3741348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nutritional realities--where does technology fit? Clydesdale FM J Am Diet Assoc; 1979 Jan; 74(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 762337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preparing America's food safety system for the twenty-first century--who is responsible for what when it comes to meeting the food safety challenges of the consumer-driven global economy? Taylor MR Food Drug Law J; 1997; 52(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 10346706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]