These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6892763)

  • 1. Neurophysiological requirements for implanted cochlear prostheses.
    Keidel WD
    Audiology; 1980; 19(2):105-27. PubMed ID: 6892763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurophysiological requirements for implanted cochlear prostheses.
    Keidel WD
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(3-4):163-9. PubMed ID: 442995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory prostheses--a challenge for neurophysiology.
    Finkenzeller P
    Audiology; 1980; 19(2):176-87. PubMed ID: 6892768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Encoding and decoding of auditory signals in relation to human speech and its application to human cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Spillmann T; Fisch UP; Leifer LJ
    Audiology; 1980; 19(2):146-63. PubMed ID: 6892766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple-electrode cochlear implant for profound or total hearing loss: a review.
    Clark GM; Tong YC
    Med J Aust; 1981 Apr; 1(8):428-9. PubMed ID: 7019645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear implant prostheses: strategies and progress.
    Merzenich MM; Byers CL; White M; Vivion MC
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1980; 8(4-6):361-8. PubMed ID: 7027838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical stimulation with multichannel electrodes in deaf patients.
    Burian K; Hochmair E; Hochmair-Desoyer I; Lessel MR
    Audiology; 1980; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 6892764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cochlear prosthesis: a review of the design and evaluation of electrode implants for the profoundly deaf.
    Spelman FA
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1982; 8(3):223-52. PubMed ID: 6754255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maturation of the mismatch negativity: effects of profound deafness and cochlear implant use.
    Ponton CW; Eggermont JJ; Don M; Waring MD; Kwong B; Cunningham J; Trautwein P
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(3-4):167-85. PubMed ID: 10859411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fundamental considerations in designing auditory implants.
    Kiang NY; Eddington DK; Delgutte B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(3-4):204-18. PubMed ID: 443001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model for the electrostimulation of the nervus acusticus.
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Hochmair ES; Motz H; Rattay F
    Neuroscience; 1984 Oct; 13(2):553-62. PubMed ID: 6549052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory and speech performance in deaf children with deaf parents after cochlear implant.
    Park GY; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Chung EW; Cho YS; Chung WH; Hong SH
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 23324738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech processing for cochlear implant prostheses.
    Millar JB; Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Jun; 27(2):280-96. PubMed ID: 6547495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Salvi RJ; Henderson D; Hamernik R; Ahroon WA
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(3):115-29. PubMed ID: 6345246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the coding of frequency, the perception of pitch and the development of cochlear implant speech processing strategies for profoundly deaf people.
    Clark GM
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1996 Sep; 23(9):766-76. PubMed ID: 8911712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Changes of the late acoustically evoked potentials in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Schmidt R; Kaftan H; Hosemann W; Gräbel S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Mar; 84(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 15770566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech encoding in the auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implants.
    Sachs MB; Young ED; Miller MI
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():94-113. PubMed ID: 6575675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The University of Melbourne--nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant.
    Clark GM; Blamey PJ; Brown AM; Gusby PA; Dowell RC; Franz BK; Pyman BC; Shepherd RK; Tong YC; Webb RL
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1987; 38():V-IX, 1-181. PubMed ID: 3318305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.
    Rattay F
    Artif Organs; 1997 Mar; 21(3):213-5. PubMed ID: 9148708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.