These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6895542)

  • 21. Surgical treatment and rehabilitation of prelingually and perilingually deafened children and adults with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    García JM; Barón de Otero C; García J; Peñaranda A; Niño C; Campos S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8205978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pre-implant evaluation of speech and hearing.
    Abel SM; Tse SM
    J Otolaryngol; 1987 Oct; 16(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 3682048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Rehabilitation and assessment of aural-oral speech development in children with cochlear implants].
    Lantsov AA; Koroleva IV; Pudov VI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2000; (3):6-12. PubMed ID: 10846480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants.
    Hinderink JB; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 7769946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Auditory and communication learning in patients with cochlear implants].
    Bucher PO; Mathis A; Arnold W
    HNO; 1989 Jun; 37(6):250-4. PubMed ID: 2745170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Results and experiences with 55 cochlear implantations].
    Pedersen CB; Jochumsen U; Madsen S; Koefoed-Nielsen B; Johansen LV
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(40):5346-50. PubMed ID: 11036450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Speech discrimination in post-lingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Lautischer M; Baumgartner WD
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):487-91. PubMed ID: 10890126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The University of California, San Francisco/Storz cochlear implant program.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Yanda J
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):287-305. PubMed ID: 3520442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
    Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Experiences with the implantation of a multichannel electrode in the acoustic nerve].
    Naumann HH; Zwicker E; Scherer H; Seifert J; Leysieffer H; Zollner M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 3754920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing.
    Cowan RS; DelDot J; Barker EJ; Sarant JZ; Pegg P; Dettman S; Galvin KL; Rance G; Hollow R; Dowell RC; Pyman B; Gibson WP; Clark GM
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S125-6. PubMed ID: 9391629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of promontory and cochlear implants within a single subject.
    Edgerton BJ; House WF; Doyle KJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):100-3. PubMed ID: 6805388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Extensive hearing loss and deafness in adults].
    Laszig R
    Ther Umsch; 1993 Sep; 50(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 8273025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Computer-assisted rehabilitation of auditory perception after cochlear implants and hearing aid management].
    Gross M; Herrmann HW
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 8172634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Multivariate study of auditory perception using multi-electrode cochlear implants].
    Picard M; Ferron P; Rochette C; Meyer F; Bergeron F; Blaney D; Desgagné M
    J Otolaryngol; 1992 Apr; 21(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 1583705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Results with the currently used cochlear implant.
    Ito J; Takagi A; Kawano M; Takahashi H; Honjo I
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():298-300. PubMed ID: 7668678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of residual high-frequency hearing on the outcome in congenitally deaf cochlear implant recipients.
    Kuo SC; Gibson WP
    Am J Otol; 2000 Sep; 21(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 10993454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.