These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6896043)

  • 1. Review of current status of cochlear prostheses.
    White RL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1982 Apr; 29(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 6896043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear implant prostheses: strategies and progress.
    Merzenich MM; Byers CL; White M; Vivion MC
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1980; 8(4-6):361-8. PubMed ID: 7027838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear nucleus auditory prostheses.
    McCreery DB
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):64-73. PubMed ID: 18207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Paired pulse discrimination test for evaluating auditory nerve function in deaf patients with cochlear prostheses].
    Yun JT; Chang Y; Wang ZZ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1986 Aug; 8(4):282-5. PubMed ID: 2953476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrical stimulation with multichannel electrodes in deaf patients.
    Burian K; Hochmair E; Hochmair-Desoyer I; Lessel MR
    Audiology; 1980; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 6892764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inner ear implants for experimental electrical stimulation of auditory nerve arrays.
    Xue XL; Pfingst BE
    J Neurosci Methods; 1989 Jun; 28(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 2755177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Status praesens: cochlear implant. UIA-KULeuven-Forelec.
    Peeters S; Marquet J; Sansen W; van Paemel M; Offeciers E; Joris P; Somers T; Bosiers W
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1985; 39(4):763-81. PubMed ID: 3841458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG; Liu S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates.
    Laback B; Majdak P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan; 105(2):814-7. PubMed ID: 18182489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ineraid cochlear implant in the ossified cochlea: surgical techniques and results.
    Montandon PB; Boëx C; Pelizzone M
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 8572086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cochlear implants in the deaf: indications, methods, results].
    Spillmann T; Dillier N
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1985 Feb; 74(9):211-9. PubMed ID: 3838591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
    Jolly CN; Clopton BM; Spelman FA; Lineaweaver SK
    Med Prog Technol; 1997; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Growth of loudness for sinusoidal and pulsatile electrical stimulation.
    Shannon RV
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1981; 90(2 Pt 3):13-4. PubMed ID: 6784644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence for association between perception of electrical stimuli and rehabilitation dynamics in users of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
    Tavartkiladze GA; Frolenkov GI; Mironova EV
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():181-4. PubMed ID: 7668627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A model for the electrostimulation of the nervus acusticus.
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Hochmair ES; Motz H; Rattay F
    Neuroscience; 1984 Oct; 13(2):553-62. PubMed ID: 6549052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Electric stimulation of the acoustic nerve in totally deaf persons. Current status of clinical use].
    Burian K
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Apr; 104(14):485-8. PubMed ID: 312188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Otosclerosis: selection of ear for cochlear implantation.
    Matterson AG; O'Leary S; Pinder D; Freidman L; Dowell R; Briggs R
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):438-46. PubMed ID: 17468676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of a promontory stimulation test using a transtympanic needle electrode with a test using an ear canal electrode.
    Khan S; Raine CH; Becconsall K
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():190-2. PubMed ID: 7668631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value of the promontory stimulation test in predicting speech perception after cochlear implantation.
    Lee JC; Yoo MH; Ahn JH; Lee KS
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Nov; 117(11):1988-92. PubMed ID: 17767084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.