These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6897153)
21. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Distribution of research awards from the National Institutes of Health among medical schools. Aron DC; Aucott JN; Papp KK N Engl J Med; 2000 Jun; 342(23):1754; author reply 1754-5. PubMed ID: 10858096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants. Kaiser J Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. National Institutes of Health: the lottery. Heilman KM Ann Neurol; 2007 Jul; 62(1):106. PubMed ID: 17474112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Confidentiality of research grant protocols. Morgan TE; Keyes JA; Sherman JF Clin Res; 1976 Jan; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 10277868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. U.S. research spending. Scientists feel the pain as 2007 budget outlook grows dark. Mervis J Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1666-7. PubMed ID: 17170258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. What can be learned by assessing funding patterns for pain research? A commentary on National Institutes of Health grant awards for pain, nausea, and dyspnea research. Dubner R J Pain; 2005 May; 6(5):275-6. PubMed ID: 15890629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. National Institutes of Health implements electronic grant submission. J Investig Med; 2007 Jan; 55(1):9. PubMed ID: 17443943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Accessing on-line information at the National Institutes of Health. Highlights and practical tips. Brown LP; Bair AH; Meier PP; Pugh LC; Spatz DL; Borucki LC; Morin KH Comput Nurs; 1998; 16(4):198-201. PubMed ID: 9675986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health. Kirschstein RL Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Subverting U.S. health. Los Angeles Times; 2003 Dec; ():M4. PubMed ID: 14971390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. National Institutes of Health--supported opportunities in Comparative Medicine. Strandberg JD; Whitehair LA Comp Med; 2000 Aug; 50(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 11020151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. National Institutes of Health. Panel finds gaps in violence studies. Stone R Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5114):1584-5. PubMed ID: 8503002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Public funding for Alzheimer disease research in the United States. Hodes RJ Nat Med; 2006 Jul; 12(7):770-3. PubMed ID: 16829943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. National Research Service Awards. Final rule. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health and Human Services Fed Regist; 2001 May; 66(105):29498-501. PubMed ID: 11725763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. International health. U.S., Italy plan joint research effort. Berrie C Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5633):579. PubMed ID: 12893915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. National Institutes of Health. Report seeks stability for behavioral sciences. Kaiser J Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5703):1878. PubMed ID: 15591176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The importance of departments of internal medicine to the U.S. medical research enterprise. Schrier R Am J Med; 1994 Sep; 97(3):III-VII. PubMed ID: 8092166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The growing family of NIH institutes. Randerath K Science; 2001 Jun; 292(5523):1835-6. PubMed ID: 11398826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The crisis in clinical research. Essay review. Feinstein AR Bull Hist Med; 1995; 69(2):288-91. PubMed ID: 7613069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]