These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6899063)

  • 1. Developing criteria for promotion and tenure.
    Garrity M; Miller V; Osborn M; Vanderlinden M
    Nurs Outlook; 1980 Mar; 28(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 6899063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clarifying tenure requirements.
    Freeman LH; Voignier RR
    Nurs Outlook; 1985; 33(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 3844151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing a usable performance appraisal system.
    Brief AP
    J Nurs Adm; 1979 Oct; 9(10):7-10. PubMed ID: 258663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of nursing instructors. Chosing significant criteria].
    St-Julien D
    Nurs Que; 1990; 10(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 2300317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
    Lerch EM
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing performance standards for personnel performance.
    Halterman CA
    Quintessence Dent Technol; 1981 Apr; 5(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 6941338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reaping the professional rewards of faculty evaluation.
    Cudney SA
    Nurs Health Care; 1985 Oct; 6(8):451-7. PubMed ID: 3851197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing performance-appraisal systems.
    Ross SR
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1984 Aug; 41(8):1567-73. PubMed ID: 6475976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Managing your academic career. The rocky road to tenure.
    Rose MA
    Nurse Educ; 1986; 11(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 3640243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Faculty evaluation: our shackle or parachute?
    Sullivan MJ
    Nurs Health Care; 1985 Oct; 6(8):446-8. PubMed ID: 3851196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reviewing performance appraisal policies can lead to improved worker health.
    Rosen RH
    Bus Health; 1984 Sep; 1(9):54. PubMed ID: 10267658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rethinking the promotion and tenure process: a response to Hiller and Ritvo.
    Ottenbacher KJ; Stull GA
    J Allied Health; 1992; 21(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1601732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic faculty evaluation: a growing critical concern.
    Bobbitt KC
    J Nurs Educ; 1985 Feb; 24(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 2984376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Employee performance appraisal presents unique opportunities.
    Harris JG
    Tex Hosp; 1985 Nov; 41(6):22-3. PubMed ID: 10275243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review--why and how to do it.
    Jackson SA
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance appraisal for the '80s.
    Brush DH; Schoenfeldt LF
    Pers Adm; 1982 Dec; 27(12):76-83. PubMed ID: 10260398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidelines for effective and defensible performance appraisal systems.
    Wells RG
    Pers J; 1982 Oct; 61(10):776-82. PubMed ID: 10258015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Standards for performance appraisal of academic staff at a nursing college].
    Aucamp H; Muller M
    Curationis; 2000 Mar; 23(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 11140024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ten myths about criterion reference performance appraisal.
    Berger L; Clipp FP
    South Hosp; 1982; 50(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 10257273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An appraisal system that yields results.
    Blai B
    Superv Manage; 1983 Nov; 28(11):39-42. PubMed ID: 10263109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.