These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Performance appraisal: a positive management tool. Smith KE Coll Rev; 1984; 1(2):43-62. PubMed ID: 10268509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Using results to rate performance. English JW; Gottesman JI Health Serv Manager; 1980 Oct; 13(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 10248518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Nursing education/service. Contracting for growth. Aroian J; Grant KJ; Gilbert JP Am J Nurs; 1984 Aug; 84(8):1042, 1044. PubMed ID: 6565461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Should decisions about your hiring, reappointment, tenure, or promotion use the impact factor score as a proxy indicator of the impact of your scholarship? Holden G; Rosenberg G; Barker K; Onghena P MedGenMed; 2006 Jul; 8(3):21. PubMed ID: 17406161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Getting the most out of performance appraisals. Gubman EL Manage Rev; 1984 Nov; 73(11):44-8. PubMed ID: 10269466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Performance appraisal, 2: Improving the rater's effectiveness. Martin DC Personnel; 1986 Aug; 63(8):28-33. PubMed ID: 10278733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Telling subordinates what to do and how to do it. English JW; Gottesman JI Superv Manage; 1979 Jul; 24(7):21-4. PubMed ID: 10242789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Developing performance criteria for merit pay: one school's process. Jenkins HM; Dienemann JA; Boland ML J Prof Nurs; 1988; 4(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 3397449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Managing adversity in the tenure and promotion process. Symanski ME Nurse Educ; 1993; 18(4):21-5. PubMed ID: 8345916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]