These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 690332)

  • 1. Perception of speech sounds with alternate formants presented to opposite ears.
    Ainsworth WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 May; 63(5):1528-34. PubMed ID: 690332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loudness of an auditory scene composed of multiple talkers.
    Yost WA; Pastore MT; Pulling KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):EL236. PubMed ID: 30424669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The role of amplitude modulation in forming the auditory images of speech signals].
    Liublimskaia VV; Malinnikova TG; Chernova EI
    Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 1994 Oct; 80(10):39-52. PubMed ID: 7536540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binaural fusion and listening effort in children who use bilateral cochlear implants: a psychoacoustic and pupillometric study.
    Steel MM; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117611. PubMed ID: 25668423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brainstem encoding of voiced consonant--vowel stop syllables.
    Johnson KL; Nicol T; Zecker SG; Bradlow AR; Skoe E; Kraus N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 119(11):2623-35. PubMed ID: 18818121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Activation and application of an obligatory phonotactic constraint in German during automatic speech processing is revealed by human event-related potentials.
    Steinberg J; Truckenbrodt H; Jacobsen T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jul; 77(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20381548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of reverberation-related binaural cues in the externalization of speech.
    Catic J; Santurette S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):1154-67. PubMed ID: 26328729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual cues to the voiced-voiceless distinction of final fricatives for listeners with impaired or with normal hearing.
    Revoile SG; Holden-Pitt L; Pickett JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Mar; 77(3):1263-5. PubMed ID: 3980876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual influences on perception of speech and nonspeech vocal-tract events.
    Brancazio L; Best CT; Fowler CA
    Lang Speech; 2006; 49(Pt 1):21-53. PubMed ID: 16922061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition of plosive syllables in noise: comparison of an auditory model with human performance.
    Ainsworth WA; Meyer GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):687-94. PubMed ID: 7930068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responses of "high-spontaneous" auditory-nerve fibers to consonant-vowel syllables in noise.
    Geisler CD; Gamble T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1639-52. PubMed ID: 2708680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the responses of auditory nerve fibers to consonant-vowel syllables with predictions from linear models.
    Sinex DG; Geisler CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 6747103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispheric differences in the effects of context on vowel perception.
    Sjerps MJ; Mitterer H; McQueen JM
    Brain Lang; 2012 Mar; 120(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 22284299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The auditory perception of frequency-localized acoustic on-events].
    Liublinskaia VV; Stoliarova EI; Malinnikova TG
    Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 1995 Jul; 81(7):120-30. PubMed ID: 8714387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech.
    Nogaki G; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17496666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Perceptual, acoustical and aerodynamic study of whispering].
    Higashikawa M
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1994 Jul; 97(7):1268-80. PubMed ID: 8064511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling Two-Channel Speech Processing With the EPIC Cognitive Architecture.
    Kieras DE; Wakefield GH; Thompson ER; Iyer N; Simpson BD
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):291-304. PubMed ID: 26748483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhanced passive and active processing of syllables in musician children.
    Chobert J; Marie C; François C; Schön D; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 23(12):3874-87. PubMed ID: 21736456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.