These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 690576)

  • 1. Recognition failure of recallable words and recognizable words.
    Wallace WP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1978 Sep; 4(5):441-52. PubMed ID: 690576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The TECO theory and lawful dependency in successive episodic memory tests.
    Sikström S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):693-728. PubMed ID: 10994226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endogenous versus exogenous attentional cuing effects on memory.
    Hauer BJ; MacLeod CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):305-20. PubMed ID: 16458848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Encoding specificity: retrieval asymmetry in the recognition failure paradigm.
    Bartling CA; Thompson CP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1977 Nov; 3(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 915447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonverbal local context cues explicit but not implicit memory.
    Mori M; Graf P
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):91-116. PubMed ID: 8733925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Theoretical correlations and measured correlations: relating recognition and recall in four distributed memory models.
    Kahana MJ; Rizzuto DS; Schneider AR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):933-53. PubMed ID: 16248743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Deficits in memory retrieval: an argument in favor of frontal subcortical dysfunction in depression].
    Fossati P; Deweer B; Raoux N; Allilaire JF
    Encephale; 1995; 21(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 7588169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Successive tests of pair recognition.
    Sikström SP
    Memory; 1998 Sep; 6(5):531-54. PubMed ID: 10197162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Recall and reproduction of words: age-dependent activation of context information in recalling episodic memory contents].
    Hasselhorn M; Hager W; Cienciala D
    Z Gerontol; 1989; 22(6):298-307. PubMed ID: 2623931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Levels-of-processing effects on a variety of memory tasks: new findings and theoretical implications.
    Challis BH; Velichkovsky BM; Craik FI
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):142-64. PubMed ID: 8733928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Picture rehearsal: an effect of selectively attending to pictures no longer in view.
    Graefe TM; Watkins MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Mar; 6(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 7373247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Encoding and cuing sounds and senses.
    Nelson DL; Friedrich MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Nov; 6(6):717-31. PubMed ID: 7441188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 17352622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults.
    Meade ML; Roediger HL
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(3):433-62. PubMed ID: 17061694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model.
    Huber DE; Clark TF; Curran T; Winkielman P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1305-24. PubMed ID: 18980396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward a unified account of spacing effects in explicit cued-memory tasks.
    Russo R; Mammarella N; Avons SE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):819-29. PubMed ID: 12219792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of encoding manipulation on word-stem cued recall: an event-related potential study.
    Fay S; Isingrini M; Ragot R; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):615-26. PubMed ID: 16099370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.