These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6906012)
1. Nurse involvement in Institutional Review Boards; the service setting perspective. Robb SS Nurs Res; 1981; 30(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 6906012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Institutional Review Board: a case study of no-risk decisions in health-related research. Gortner SR; Heath E; Sanders P Nurs Res; 1981; 30(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 6906010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nurses on hospital IRBs: a critical voice in protecting human subjects. Cassidy VR; Oddi LF Nursingconnections; 1993; 6(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 8487874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Hospital Ethics Committee. Campbell JD; McEwin K Med J Aust; 1981; 1(4):168-9. PubMed ID: 7231276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The structure and functioning of ethical review committees. Gutteridge F; Bankowski Z; Curran W; Dunne J Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(20):1791-800. PubMed ID: 7178924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Research program development in a tertiary care setting. Fuhs MF; Moore K Nurs Res; 1981; 30(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 6906011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research policy for nursing services: Part 2. Hodgman EC J Nurs Adm; 1981 May; 11(5):33-6. PubMed ID: 6915095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The institutional review board: an evolving ethics committee. Lind SE J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 1463879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reviewing the reviewers: a survey of institutional ethics committees in Australia. McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW Med J Aust; 1990 Mar; 152(6):289-96. PubMed ID: 2314331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human experimentation: issues before the hospital administrator. Wielk CA Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1977; 22(3):4-25. PubMed ID: 12085914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Perspectives of research participants, psychologist investigators, and institutional review boards. Schreier BA; Stadler HA Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1067-72. PubMed ID: 1501970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Research in the hospital setting on human subjects. Protecting the patient and the institution. Scheuer R Mt Sinai J Med; 1993 Oct; 60(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 8259119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Research on the profession of nursing. Ethical inquiry. Gortner SR Annu Rev Nurs Res; 1985; 3():193-214. PubMed ID: 3893476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The speculum bites back: feminists spark an inquiry into the treatment of carcinoma in situ at Auckland's National Women's Hospital. Rosier P Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 11659299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of the nurse on hospital ethics committees. Murphy P Nurs Clin North Am; 1989 Jun; 24(2):551-6. PubMed ID: 2657674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of the institutional review board in research involving human subjects. Bosso JA Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1983 Nov; 17(11):828-34. PubMed ID: 6641508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]