BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6906849)

  • 1. RN's professional acts: hospital accountability. Case in point: South Bend Osteopathic Hosp. v. Phillips (411 N.E. 2d 387 - IND.).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1981 Jan; 21(8):4. PubMed ID: 6906849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dr. orders "no code" without alert patient's consent. Case in point: Payne v. Marion General Hosp. (549 N.E.2d 1043--IN (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Apr; 30(11):2. PubMed ID: 2356312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does judgment for nurse require judgment for hospital? Case in point: Eversole v. Oklahoma Hosp. Founders (818 P. 2d. 456--OK (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Feb; 32(9):4. PubMed ID: 1565799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intensive care nursing: doctor problems. Case in point: Poor Sisters v. Catron (435 N.E. 2d 305 - IN).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1982 Sep; 23(4):4. PubMed ID: 6923436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intentional & unintentional acts: malpractice. Case in point: Cudges v. Our Lady of Lourdes Hosp. (514 So. 2d 195--LA).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jan; 28(8):4. PubMed ID: 3344350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Doctor "on call": ER nurse sued. Case in point: Bartimus v. Paxton Community Hosp. (458 N.E. 2d 1072 - IL).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Mar; 24(10):4. PubMed ID: 6561693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. RN's and criminal assault: legal rights. Case in point: Name v. Southern Baptist Hosp. et al (415 So. 2d 993 - LA).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1982 Sep; 23(4):2. PubMed ID: 6923434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RN's testimony admissible re nursing negligence-not medical malpractice. Case on point: Broehm v. Rochester, 690 N.W.2d 721-MN (2005).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Mar; 45(10):2. PubMed ID: 15847281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. X-ray machine falls on patient: nurses' liability issue. Case in point: Carter v. Anderson Memorial Hosp. (325 S.E. 2d 78--SC).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Apr; 25(11):2. PubMed ID: 3846311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Captain of ship doctrine: vicarious liability. Case in point: Krane v. Saint Anthony Hosp. Systems (738 P. 2d 75-CO).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Aug; 28(3):4. PubMed ID: 2442796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can you be terminated at any time? Case in point: Ewing v. Bd. of Trustees of Pulaska Mem. Hosp. (486 N.E.2d 1094-IN).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Feb; 26(9):2. PubMed ID: 3634411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Juror formerly worked as RN at hospital: new trial. Case on point: Mikesinovich v. Reynolds Mem. Hosp., Inc., No. 32968(W.Va. 11/16/2006) S.E.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 Jan; 47(8):4. PubMed ID: 17310606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Spiritual" nursing care: liability issue. Case in point: Baumgartner v. First Church of Christ (490 N.E.2d 1319-IL).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Jun; 27(1):4. PubMed ID: 3636942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deficient charting: weak link in evidence. Case in point: Esteve v. Iberia Parish Hosp. (539 So. 2d 727--LA (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 May; 29(12):2. PubMed ID: 2734445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When doctors ignore nurses' advice: disaster. Case in point: Tabor v. Doctors Memorial Hosp. (520 So. 2d 243-LA).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Mar; 27(10):4. PubMed ID: 3647527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tonsillectomy--anesthetic overdose: 1 million dollars damages. Case in point: Theophelis v. Lansing General Hosp. (366 N.W.2d 249-MI).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Aug; 26(3):4. PubMed ID: 3850614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Arteriography: nurses, doctors sued - cleared. Case in point: Hirn v. Edgewater Hospital et als (408 N.E. 2d 970 - ILL).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1981 Feb; 21(9):4. PubMed ID: 6906853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Dreadful nursing care": $3 million damages awarded. Case in point: Herman v. Milwaukee Children's Hosp. (361 N.W. 2d 297 - WI).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Mar; 25(10):2. PubMed ID: 3845614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. $1.2 million in R.N. post-op negligence. Case in point: Variety Childrens Hosp. Inc. v. Perkins et al (382 So. 2d 331-FLA.).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1980 Aug; 21(3):4. PubMed ID: 6158742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chairman's letter: responsibility for quality of patient care.
    Potter HF
    OH; 1977 Sep; 21(8):4. PubMed ID: 10306113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.