These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6910049)

  • 1. [Worker assessment].
    Rogula W
    Pieleg Polozna; 1981; (2):10-1. PubMed ID: 6910049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Worker assessment in practice].
    Ksykiewicz-Dorota A; Drygała M
    Pieleg Polozna; 1983; (7):12-4, 22. PubMed ID: 6557572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving clinical evaluation.
    Dracup K
    Superv Nurse; 1979 Jun; 10(6):24-7. PubMed ID: 256230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuous assessment for nurses in the Thomas Guy School of Nursing.
    Young AP; Morgan W
    Nurs Times; 1978 Dec 21-28; 74(51):Suppl 35:141-4. PubMed ID: 253250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Professional assessment: for a better understanding of its basic mechanisms].
    Auxiliaire; 1980; 53(4):12-5. PubMed ID: 6905757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nursing management in critical care units. Performance appraisal of staff nurses: Part I.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 6918283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance appraisal of staff nurses - part III. Developing performance standards and an evaluation tool for staff nurses.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(5):36-44. PubMed ID: 6924871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementing a performance evaluation system.
    del Bueno D
    Superv Nurse; 1979 Feb; 10(2):48-52. PubMed ID: 253417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An objective appraisal instrument for registered nurses.
    West N; Sudbury J; Ayers M
    Superv Nurse; 1979 Mar; 10(3):32-8. PubMed ID: 253425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strengthening the nursing service organization.
    Ganong J; Ganong W
    J Nurs Adm; 1977 Sep; 7(7):14-5, 52. PubMed ID: 587722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
    Goodykoontz L
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Supervision - systematic guidance].
    Lie K
    Sykepleien; 1982 Oct; 69(17):16-7. PubMed ID: 6923582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competency based clinical evaluation.
    Townsend CT
    AD Nurse; 1988; 3(3):25-8. PubMed ID: 3355754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Avoiding the evaluation blues.
    Weaver D; Wisenbaker S
    AD Nurse; 1987; 2(4):37-8. PubMed ID: 3647793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
    Lerch EM
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Criteria for assessment of resident medical officer performance.
    Wood TJ; Stetaford RP; Stace J
    Natl Hosp Health Care; 1975 Aug; 1(4):26-8. PubMed ID: 10246398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of a new critical care nurse.
    McIntyre E
    Focus AACN; 1982; 9(5):3-6. PubMed ID: 6925991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of nursing instructors. Chosing significant criteria].
    St-Julien D
    Nurs Que; 1990; 10(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 2300317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of the capabilities of public health nurses by legislative authorities].
    Aoyama M
    Hokenfu Zasshi; 1988 Dec; 44(12):1065-9. PubMed ID: 3221552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Professional appraisal--a double-selection mechanism].
    Nurs Que; 1986; 6(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 3633484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.