BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6910946)

  • 1. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
    Goodykoontz L
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance appraisal tests for staff nurses.
    Cunningham CV
    Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(22):suppl 16: 61-3. PubMed ID: 6909815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating clinical competency in nursing.
    Lunde KF; Durbin-Lafferty E
    Nurs Manage; 1986 Aug; 17(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 3637728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Establishing a criterion-based performance appraisal for a department of nursing.
    Megel MA
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1983 Sep; 18(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 6554709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Staff nurse performance. Effects of goal-setting and performance feedback.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986; 16(7-8):26-30. PubMed ID: 3637221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance appraisal of staff nurses - part III. Developing performance standards and an evaluation tool for staff nurses.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(5):36-44. PubMed ID: 6924871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A framework for assessing performance problems.
    Meyer AL
    J Nurs Adm; 1984 May; 14(5):40-3. PubMed ID: 6562171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating supplemental professional nurses.
    Metzger NJ
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):54-5, 58-9, 62. PubMed ID: 2294495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Assessment of the work efficiency of nurses].
    Vedenko BG; Sushchik LP; Vedenko LB
    Med Sestra; 1985 Sep; 44(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 3853062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of the work of nurses by reckoning with the results of socialist competition].
    Khorov GV; Alekseev AV; Borovitskaia LV
    Med Sestra; 1988 Jun; 47(6):11-4. PubMed ID: 3412159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nursing management in critical care units. Performance appraisal of staff nurses: Part I.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 6918283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward a comprehensive personnel system: performance appraisal--Part IV.
    Nauright L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Aug; 18(8):67-70, 75-7. PubMed ID: 3649657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the scene: University of Cincinnati Hospital. Confronting inadequate clinical performance.
    Gallagher PH; Teehan MP
    Nurs Adm Q; 1985; 9(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 3844110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Personnel evaluation in nursing].
    Sotomayor A
    Bol Col Prof Enferm P R; 1983 Jun; 9(34):9-13. PubMed ID: 6590066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement technology applications in performance appraisal.
    Stalker MZ; Kornblith AB; Lewis PM; Parker R
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):12-7. PubMed ID: 3633963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Setting standards and evaluating nursing performance with a single tool.
    Fosbinder D; Vos H
    J Nurs Adm; 1989 Oct; 19(10):23-30. PubMed ID: 2778515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The evaluation-notation].
    Mizrahi MR
    Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1990; (109-110):30-6. PubMed ID: 2389233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance appraisal systems in health care administration.
    Wiatrowski MD; Palkon DS
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1987; 12(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 3557974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nurse performance: strengths and weaknesses.
    McCloskey JC; McCain B
    Nurs Res; 1988; 37(5):308-13. PubMed ID: 3419947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.