135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6912303)
21. The cervical cap: effectiveness as a contraceptive.
Boehm D
J Nurse Midwifery; 1983; 28(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 6551434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Vaginal contraceptives merge old forms, new data.
Contracept Technol Update; 1983 Jul; 4(7):73-5. PubMed ID: 12339358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The use of cervical caps at the University of California, Berkeley: a survey.
Smith GG; Lee RJ
Contraception; 1984 Aug; 30(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 6499435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The cervical cap.
Secor RM
NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1992; 3(2):236-45. PubMed ID: 1596432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Vaginal colonization of Escherichia coli and its relation to contraceptive methods.
Percival-Smith R; Bartlett KH; Chow AW
Contraception; 1983 May; 27(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 6349927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A phase I study of Femcap used with and without spermicide. Postcoital testing.
Mauck CK; Baker JM; Barr SP; Johanson W; Archer DF
Contraception; 1997 Aug; 56(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 9315420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Nonprescription vaginal contraception.
Edelman DA
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1980; 18(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 6110578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effectiveness of the non-spermicidal fit-free diaphragm.
Smith C; Farr G; Feldblum PJ; Spence A
Contraception; 1995 May; 51(5):289-91. PubMed ID: 7628202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Contraceptive problems unique to the United States.
Tyrer LB; Salas JE
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jun; 32(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 2743644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Longevity of Ortho Creme and Gynol II in the contraceptive diaphragm.
Leitch WS
Contraception; 1986 Oct; 34(4):381-93. PubMed ID: 3780236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contraception with the cervical cap: effectiveness, safety, continuity of use, and user satisfaction.
Powell MG; Mears BJ; Deber RB; Ferguson D
Contraception; 1986 Mar; 33(3):215-32. PubMed ID: 3720304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Adolescent contraception.
Kreutner AK
Pediatr Clin North Am; 1981 May; 28(2):455-73. PubMed ID: 7243372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fitting the cervical cap.
Brokaw AK; Baker NN; Haney SL
Nurse Pract; 1988 Jul; 13(7):49-50, 52, 55. PubMed ID: 3405494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The cervical cap as a barrier contraceptive.
Cagen R
Contraception; 1986 May; 33(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 3757513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Experimental cervical cap has advantages over other methods.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Nov; 12(11):177-9. PubMed ID: 12318408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. New spermicide: FHI developing propranolol.
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1986; 7(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 12340619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Barrier contraceptives.
Connell EB
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jun; 32(2):377-86. PubMed ID: 2663278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Barrier methods of contraception.
Skrine RL
Practitioner; 1985 May; 229(1403):441-6. PubMed ID: 4011571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Historical survey of modern reversible contraceptive methods].
Mbabajende V
Imbonezamuryango; 1986 Apr; (5):14-7. PubMed ID: 12268230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An historical look at a contemporary question: the cervical cap.
Zimmet JA; Reagan PA
Health Educ; 1986; 17(5):53-7. PubMed ID: 3152361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
