These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. [Legal liability in failed sterilization from the physician's viewpoint]. Hammerstein J Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):678-81; discussion 681-3. PubMed ID: 8588445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion. Asaro A Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Compensation for incorrect sterilizations - remarks on the judgment of the German Supreme Court of 18 March 1980]. Hăndel K Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1981; 39():233-7. PubMed ID: 7305848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Supreme Court requires consent for sterilization. Can Hum Rights Advocate; 1986 Nov; 2(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 11660166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. New sterilization regs lengthen waiting time to 30 days. Drug Res Rep; 1978 Nov; 21(46):RN-4. PubMed ID: 12335456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Social and psychological perspectives on voluntary sterilization: a review. Philliber SG; Philliber WW Stud Fam Plann; 1985; 16(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 3983979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Acceptance of sterilization by tubal ligation by women (author's transl)]. Wenderlein JM Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1974 Nov; 34(11):940-1. PubMed ID: 4435347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Attitudes and reactions of general practitioners and gynecologists to their patients demand for sterilization in the Rennes sanitary district. Pierotti D; Teng U; Jourdain A Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1978 Aug; 6(8):491-9. PubMed ID: 12260746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Reproductive freedom issues in legal services practice. Law S Clgh Rev; 1978 Nov; 12(7):389-403. PubMed ID: 11665039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Sterilization. Low-income women have special counseling needs. Contracept Technol Update; 1993 May; 14(5):74-7. PubMed ID: 12345151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [The court on tubal sterilization in 1985]. Soutoul JH; Pierre F J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1985; 14(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 4067211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution? Murdock CW Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):917-35. PubMed ID: 11663463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Developments--the family. V. Procreative rights. Harv Law Rev; 1980 Apr; 93(6):1296-308. PubMed ID: 11665179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The provision of sterilization services by private physicians. Orr MT; Forrest JD; Johnson JH; Tolman DL Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(5):216-20. PubMed ID: 3916183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Pregnancy after celioscopic sterilization with Hulka-Clemens Clips (author's transl)]. Tadjerouni A; Flici O; Wauters G; Hubinont PO Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1981 Dec; 9(12):821-4. PubMed ID: 12337683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Female sterilization, should its reversibility be promoted? Contracept Technol Update; 1984 Feb; 5(2):13-6. PubMed ID: 12265920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]