These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. What is happening in the struggle to obtain a sensible reimbursement system for nurse-midwives in Pennsylvania? Health Law Proj Libr Bull; 1979; 4(11-12):340-2. PubMed ID: 10245890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nurse/midwives: most Blues plans won't pay. Matlock MA Bus Insur; 1980 Mar; 14(13):1,21. PubMed ID: 10245747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Obstetricians' resistance to independent, private practice by nurse-midwives in Washington, D.C. hospitals. Langton PA Women Health; 1994; 22(1):27-48. PubMed ID: 7900402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nurse-midwives and competition: testing an assumption. Gibson R Nurs Econ; 1984; 2(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 6560231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital practice for certified nurse-midwives--privilege or right? Sinquefield G J Nurse Midwifery; 1982; 27(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 6915962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Independent reimbursement from third-party payers to nurse-midwives. Hackley BK J Nurse Midwifery; 1981; 26(3):15-23. PubMed ID: 6911151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of the malpractice crisis on certified nurse-midwives. Langton PA; Kammerer DA Nurs Forum; 1985; 22(4):149-52. PubMed ID: 3870531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Against her judgement. Beech BL; McCormick C; Savage W Nurs Times; 1996 Oct 9-15; 92(41):16-7. PubMed ID: 8932145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nurse-midwifery and The Federal Trade Commission. Bailey PP J Nurse Midwifery; 1984; 29(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 6566691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reimbursement, employment, and hospital privilege data of certified nurse-midwifery services. Ament L J Nurse Midwifery; 1998; 43(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 9718886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nurse-midwifery practice in high-volume tertiary care settings. Adams C Issues Health Care Women; 1981; 3(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 6915944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal status for direct entry midwives in your state. Gaskin IM Birth Gaz; 1997; 13(4):2, 4. PubMed ID: 9348794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The legislative status of nurse-midwifery. Trends and future implications. Bidgood-Wilson M J Nurse Midwifery; 1992; 37(3):159-60. PubMed ID: 1602326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Midwifery practice without insurance reimbursement. Interview by Eldri H. Fagerlund]. Bergtun LE Jordmorbladet; 1997; (5):20-1. PubMed ID: 9348828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Strategies for direct third-party reimbursement for nurses. Griffith HM Am J Nurs; 1982 Mar; 82(3):408-11. PubMed ID: 6917684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The midwives' work in intrauterine death should be easier if better cooperation with physicians existed]. Rådestad I; Steineck G; Ransjö-Arvidson AB; Sjögren B Lakartidningen; 1989 May; 86(21):2021-3. PubMed ID: 2733519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Collaborative practice. A resource guide for midwives. Miller S; King T J Nurse Midwifery; 1998; 43(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9489294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Kansas court refuses to ban lay midwifery. Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 May; 36(12):1. PubMed ID: 8716821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]