These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6920296)
1. In vitro activity of BU-2313B against anaerobic bacteria. Bansal MB; Dhawan VK; Thadepalli H Chemotherapy; 1982; 28(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 6920296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to five antimicrobial agents and demonstration of resistance of Bacteroides fragilis to clindamycin. Sofianou D; Douboyas J; Papapanagiotou J; Paradelis AG Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1982; 4(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 7121128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to ticarcillin, cefoxitin, metronidazole, and related antimicrobial agents. Henderson DK; Chow AW; Guze LB Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1977 Apr; 11(4):679-82. PubMed ID: 856019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in vitro to 23 antimicrobial agents. Bach VT; Thadepalli H Chemotherapy; 1980; 26(5):344-53. PubMed ID: 6446448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to nine antimicrobial agents and demonstration of decreased susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to penicillin. Marrie TJ; Haldane EV; Swantee CA; Kerr EA Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Jan; 19(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 6264842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antimicrobial therapy of postpartum endomyometritis. I. Comparative susceptibility of mezlocillin and other antibiotics to genital anaerobic bacteria. Sorrell TC; Marshall JR; Chow AW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Oct; 141(3):242-5. PubMed ID: 6456667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Activity of seven antimicrobial agents against "Bacteroides fragilis" (author's transl)]. Tytgat F Ann Microbiol (Paris); 1980; 131(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 6899739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparative study in vitro on the activity of 7 antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria from hospital isolates]. Braga A; Bernieri F; Mandelli M; Mosconi P; Rossi A Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1985; 64(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 4074510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro activity of pipecolic acid amide of clindamycin (U-57930E) on anaerobic bacteria compared with those of clindamycin, cefoxitin, and chloramphenicol. Dhawan VK; Bansal MB; Thadepalli H Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Aug; 22(2):350-1. PubMed ID: 6927289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro activity of flomoxef compared to moxalactam, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and clindamycin against anaerobes. Werner H; Heizmann W; Luft G Arzneimittelforschung; 1988 Nov; 38(11):1553-6. PubMed ID: 3214438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multicenter study of the in vitro antianaerobic activity of cefotetan compared with other antimicrobial agents. Zabransky RJ; Bobey DG; Sheikh W Am J Surg; 1988 May; 155(5A):47-51. PubMed ID: 3163901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria from the intestinal microflora of healthy children and antimicrobial-treated children in Nicaragua. Cáceres M; Carera E; Palmgren AC; Nord CE Rev Esp Quimioter; 1998 Sep; 11(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 9795308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Sweden in 1983. Nord CE; Olsson-Liljequist B Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1984; 43():44-9. PubMed ID: 6100139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria to cefoperazone and other antibiotics. Kaye D; Kobasa W; Kaye K Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Jun; 17(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 6447475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro activity of BAY y 3118, and nine other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria. García-Rodríguez JA; García-Sánchez JE; Trujillano-Martín I; García-Sánchez E; García-García MI; Fresnadillo-Martínez MJ J Chemother; 1995 Jun; 7(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 7562012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antimicrobial resistance and resistance transfer in anaerobic. A review. Tally FP; Malamy MH Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1984; 91():21-30. PubMed ID: 6377471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Sensitivity of strict anaerobic bacteria to metronidazole, cefoxitin, and clindamycin]. Dubreuil L; Derriennic M; Reynaud A; Devos J; Romond C; Courtieu A Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 Nov; 33(9):899-903. PubMed ID: 3909082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanism of antimicrobial resistance and resistance transfer in anaerobic bacteria. Tally FP; Malamy MH Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1982; 35():37-44. PubMed ID: 6300995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Susceptibility testing of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria by an agar dilution technique. Brown WJ; Waatti PE Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Apr; 17(4):629-35. PubMed ID: 6901592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resistance trends of Bacteroides fragilis group over an 8-year period, 1997-2004, in Korea. Roh KH; Kim S; Kim CK; Yum JH; Kim MS; Yong D; Lee K; Kim JM; Chong Y Korean J Lab Med; 2009 Aug; 29(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 19726890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]