These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6920327)

  • 1. [Estimates of the cost of the introduction of colposcopy into the screening for cervical carcinoma (author's transl)].
    Schwartz FW; Heuser MR; Brecht JG
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1982 Apr; 42(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 6920327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening for cervical neoplasia. A survey of the assumptions from studies on the screening in Maribo Amt.
    Berget A
    Dan Med Bull; 1979 Nov; 26(7):313-32. PubMed ID: 118850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The effectiveness and ultilization of screening cytology for cervical cancer in the Federal Republic of Germany (author's transl)].
    Schwartz FW
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Apr; 41(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 6908873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Prescreening methods for gynecological cytology (author's transl)].
    Soost HJ
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1977 Jun; 119(25):849-52. PubMed ID: 408603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Colposcopy may not be clinically relevant.
    Terry RR
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1999 Feb; 99(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 10079640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost effectiveness of population screening and rescreening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 6792845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acetic acid visualization of the cervix to detect cervical dysplasia.
    Van Le L; Broekhuizen FF; Janzer-Steele R; Behar M; Samter T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 81(2):293-5. PubMed ID: 8423967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Epidemiology of cancer of the cervix uteri (author's transl)].
    Sachs H; Hasche C
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1974 Nov; 34(11):921-30. PubMed ID: 4435345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The significance of atypical cervical cytology in an older population.
    Kaminski PF; Sorosky JI; Wheelock JB; Stevens CW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jan; 73(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 2535763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pap smears with reactive cellular changes: a prospective study.
    Ding DC; Hsu S; Chen SS; Hsu YH
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):938-40. PubMed ID: 17977169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cohort study of cervical cancer screening in British Columbia.
    Boyes DA; Morrison B; Knox EG; Draper GJ; Miller AB
    Clin Invest Med; 1982; 5(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 7116711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cervical smears in women under 30 years age (author's transl)].
    Dartsch W; Freundl G; Massenkeil HJ
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1978 Oct; 38(10):849-52. PubMed ID: 700345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Early diagnosis of cancer and operative gynaecology. First: The effect of screening examinations on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer (author's transl)].
    Kindermann G
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1979 Jan; 39(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 422023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of colposcopy in the screening of pre-malignant and malignant lesions of uterine cervix.
    Chakrabarti RN; Bhattacharya D; Roy NN; Das I
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1987; 8(6):603-6. PubMed ID: 3691568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Population screening for cervix carcinoma in the city of Rotterdam, 1st round].
    van der Lee-Bijlsma A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1981 Dec; 125(49):2012-5. PubMed ID: 7322220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Epidemiology of cervical carcinoma and screening activities in GDR (author's transl)].
    Ebeling K; Tanneberger S; Nischan P; Johannsmeyer D; Herold HJ
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1981; 103(17):985-96. PubMed ID: 7304026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Colposcopy and early changes of cervical carcinoma (author's transl)].
    Kühndel K; Buchholz W; Jaeckel G
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Apr; 41(4):263-5. PubMed ID: 6908874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cytology and colposcopy in mass screening for cervical cancer.
    Grönroos M; Hautera P; Järvi O; Kangas S; Rauramo L
    Acta Cytol; 1967; 11(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 5230438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-cost technology for screening uterine cervical cancer.
    Parashari A; Singh V; Sehgal A; Satyanarayana L; Sodhani P; Gupta MM
    Bull World Health Organ; 2000; 78(8):964-7. PubMed ID: 10994279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix from the age of 35?].
    Verschoof KJ; de la Fuente AA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1978 Aug; 122(33):1213-5. PubMed ID: 673057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.