These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 692100)

  • 21. Hearing aid fitting of preschool and primary school children. An evaluation using the insertion gain measurement.
    Snik AF; Hombergen GC
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 8146589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of hearing-aid gain using functional, coupler, and probe-tube measurements.
    Mason D; Popelka GR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 3724114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ability to achieve gain/frequency response and SSPL-90 under three prescription formulas with in-the-ear hearing aids.
    Sammeth CA; Peek BF; Bratt GW; Bess FH; Amberg SM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jan; 4(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 8422481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Probe-tube microphone measures in hearing-impaired children and adults.
    Barlow NL; Auslander MC; Rines D; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 1988 Oct; 9(5):243-7. PubMed ID: 3224771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coupler-related real ear gain. Interaction between subject and hearing aid type.
    Berninger E; Ovegård A; Svärd I
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 1585125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of hearing aid use on the user's residual hearing. A follow-up study.
    Markides A; Aryee DT
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 756063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A simplified real ear technique for verifying the maximum output of a hearing aid.
    Harford E; Leijon A; Lidén G; Ringdahl A; Dahlberg AK
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 6862114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Review of recent research on the selection of frequency-gain characteristics for hearing aids.
    Lippmann R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1980; 89(5 Pt 2):79-83. PubMed ID: 6786197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acoustic reflex threshold measurement in hearing aid selection.
    Rappaport BZ; Tait CA
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Mar; 102(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 1267684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects.
    Pascoe DP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1975; 84(5 pt 2 Suppl 23):1-40. PubMed ID: 1180471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Aided auditory steady-state responses in infants.
    Stroebel D; Swanepoel de W; Groenewald E
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jun; 46(6):287-92. PubMed ID: 17530513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An acoustic reflex technique of establishing hearing aid settings.
    Keith RW
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 511666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Filter effect of earmold venting: comparison of electroacoustic and psychoacoustic methods of evaluation.
    Franks JR; Cooper WA; McFall RN
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 893203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A modified polymer foam earplug for the hearing aid evaluation.
    Gerling IJ; Roeser RJ
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 7227678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Lexical outcomes in auditory closure in children with sensorineural hearing loss].
    Reeh M; Kiese-Himmel C
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 17337896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The reliability and validity of the comfort level method of setting hearing aid gain.
    Walden BE; Schuchman GI; Sedge RK
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1977 Nov; 42(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 916638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of prolonged lack of amplification on speech-recognition performance: preliminary findings.
    Silman S; Silverman CA; Emmer MB; Gelfand SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 8126657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.