These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 692169)
21. A guide to understanding informed consent. Hartgerink BJ; McMullen P; McDonough JP; McCarthy EJ CRNA; 1998 Nov; 9(4):128-34. PubMed ID: 9866487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Malpractice and informed consent--a legal ploy. DeLee ST Int Surg; 1976; 61(6-7):331-2. PubMed ID: 11664601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes. Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. 'Informed consent' to medical procedures. Skegg PD Med Sci Law; 1975; 15(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 11693128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Following doctors' orders: informed consent in Australia. Manderson D Aust Law J; 1988 Jun; 62(6):430-40. PubMed ID: 11659118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas. Cluff CA Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient. Rauzi E Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Informed consent and the family physician. Hinkle BJ J Fam Pract; 1981 Jan; 12(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 7452176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Informed consent: recent developments that affect you. Barnes G Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Jul; 58(7):35-6. PubMed ID: 7286472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The doctrine of informed consent. Stewart T Insur Couns J; 1976 Jan; 43(1):118-34. PubMed ID: 11664632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Canterbury v. Spence--the case and a few comments. Murphy WJ Forum; 1976; 11(3):716-26. PubMed ID: 11664620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability. Wallach DM; Berry SJ St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent. Grubbs WG Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Physicians and surgeons--malpractice--informed consent of patient: duty to inform patient to be established by expert medical testimony. Wash Law Rev; 1973 May; 48(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 11664248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. "Informed consent" to medical treatment: the Oregon standard of disclosure. Rollema MT Oregon Law Rev; 1978; 57(2):322-33. PubMed ID: 11664993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Informed consent: a changing standard of disclosure. Eslami M Conn Med; 1984 Jun; 48(6):407. PubMed ID: 11644146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medico-legal bulletin number 250: Doctrine of informed consent in malpractice law. Camp RC Med Leg Bull; 1974 Feb; 23(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 4846841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Wrongful birth and informed consent: Reed v. Campagnolo. Kennedy I Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 12159831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]