These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6922067)

  • 1. [The position of the IUD and intrauterine pregnancies].
    Bernaschek G; Spernol R; Beck A
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Sep; 41(9):645-7. PubMed ID: 6922067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Results of the follow-up of the position of intra-uterine device by ultra-sonography (author's transl)].
    Schmidt EH; Wagner H; Quakernack K; Beller FK
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1979 Feb; 39(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 761755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal of retained intrauterine contraceptive devices in pregnancy.
    Sachs BP; Gregory K; McArdle C; Pinshaw A
    Am J Perinatol; 1992 May; 9(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 1575829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Ultra sonography for the localization of intra-uterine contraceptive devices (i.u.d.'s) (author's transl)].
    Meyenburg M
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1978 Nov; 38(11):950-7. PubMed ID: 710881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Control of IUD-position (author's transl)].
    Bernaschek G; Endler M; Beck A
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Aug; 41(8):566-9. PubMed ID: 6912172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Value of ultrasonics in the monitoring of intrauterine devices: apropos of 120 cases].
    Rezgui M; Hajeri F; Ettagorti H; Mahmoud K; Zayani H; Haddad M
    Tunis Med; 1985; 63(6-7):390-3. PubMed ID: 4071677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrauterine device failure: relation to its location within the uterine cavity.
    Anteby E; Revel A; Ben-Chetrit A; Rosen B; Tadmor O; Yagel S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jan; 81(1):112-4. PubMed ID: 8416443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Use of intrauterine device by nulliparous women. Prospective study and preliminary data].
    Bastianelli C; Farris M; Lippa A; Lucantoni V; Valente A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1998 Jun; 50(6):231-3. PubMed ID: 9763814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pregnancy with IUD in situ.
    Fallon JH
    Kans Med; 1985 Jul; 86(7):231, 253. PubMed ID: 4032941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Applicability of ultrasonic B-scan diagnosis to localisation of intra-uterine contraceptive devices (author's transl)].
    Zanke S
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1979; 101(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 386650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insertion and removal of intrauterine devices.
    Johnson BA
    Am Fam Physician; 2005 Jan; 71(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 15663031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Intrauterine contraception with copper-T 200 device- a retrospective analysis of 334 cases (author's transl)].
    Salzer H; Schneider WH; Eppel W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1981 May; 93(11):354-8. PubMed ID: 7269615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ectopic pregnancy and intrauterine contraceptive devices: new perspectives. The Women's Health Study.
    Ory HW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Feb; 57(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 7465116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Fate of pregnancy with IUD in position].
    Csordás T; Zámbó Z
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1975; 97(26):1655-8. PubMed ID: 1210882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Barriers associated with the failure to return for intrauterine device insertion following first-trimester abortion.
    Stanek AM; Bednarek PH; Nichols MD; Jensen JT; Edelman AB
    Contraception; 2009 Mar; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 19185676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis.
    Reeves MF; Smith KJ; Creinin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1286-94. PubMed ID: 17540799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continuous sonographic monitoring of IUD extraction during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Shalev J; Greif M; Ben-Rafael Z; Itzchak Y; Serr DM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Sep; 139(3):521-3. PubMed ID: 6981317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Health risks of intrauterine contraception (author's transl)].
    Keith LG; Berger GS; Edelman DA
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Jun; 11(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 12338737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
    Forrest JD
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.