These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6922826)

  • 1. The manuscript review process of nursing journals.
    Swanson E; McCloskey JC
    Image (IN); 1982 Oct; 14(3):72-6. PubMed ID: 6922826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Journal Publishing: A Review of the Basics.
    Kennedy MS
    Semin Oncol Nurs; 2018 Nov; 34(4):361-371. PubMed ID: 30266551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.
    Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors.
    Gasparyan AY; Ayvazyan L; Blackmore H; Kitas GD
    Rheumatol Int; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1409-17. PubMed ID: 21800117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editorial peer review in US medical journals.
    Weller AC
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1344-7. PubMed ID: 2406471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation and Outcomes of a Faculty-Based, Peer Review Manuscript Writing Workshop.
    Kulage KM; Larson EL
    J Prof Nurs; 2016; 32(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 27424926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The peer review process: a primer for
    Hirsch JA; Manchikanti L; Albuquerque FC; Leslie-Mazwi TM; Lev MH; Linfante I; Mocco J; Rai AT; Schaefer PW; Tarr RW
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2017 Jul; 9(e1):e3-e6. PubMed ID: 25888447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Language committees development in medical publications: a proposal].
    Locutura J; Silva LC
    Med Clin (Barc); 2001 May; 116(18):718. PubMed ID: 11412686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publishing opportunities for nurses: a comparison of 92 U.S. journals.
    Swanson EA; McCloskey JC; Bodensteiner A
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1991; 23(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 2022386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Anonymous but irreplaceable experts in scientific journals].
    Kontula K
    Duodecim; 1993; 109(23-24):2181-3. PubMed ID: 7743970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review: part of the writing process.
    Carlson K
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1990 Feb; 5(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 2355342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using critical friends to build writing success.
    Dreyer A; Keiller L; Wolvaardt J; Frantz J
    Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 50(11):1170-1171. PubMed ID: 27762024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
    Klein JS; Harmon SP;
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Top 10 reasons a manuscript is rejected.
    Sullivan EJ
    J Prof Nurs; 2002; 18(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11859483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of the blind review process: is blindness best?
    Baggs JG
    Res Nurs Health; 1999 Apr; 22(2):93-4. PubMed ID: 10094294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ["Virtual reality" in published sciences?].
    Niethard FU
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1996; 134(6):481-2. PubMed ID: 9027115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The last judgment?].
    Dunning AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Jan; 131(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 3821965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In praise of reviewers.
    Fulton JS
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2011; 25(5):215-7. PubMed ID: 22649839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The peer-review process--and an acknowledgement of our peerless reviewers.
    Feinstein AR; Spitzer WO
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1989; 42(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 2913183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.