These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6924087)

  • 1. Use of a transparent polyurethane dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter care.
    Peterson PJ; Freeman PT
    NITA; 1982; 5(6):387-90. PubMed ID: 6924087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized clinical trial of transparent polyurethane i.v. dressings.
    Popovsky MA; Ilstrup DM
    NITA; 1986; 9(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 3517708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A transparent polyurethane membrane used as an I.V. dressing.
    Nicola M; DeChairo D
    NITA; 1984; 7(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 6561401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of transparent polyurethane and dry gauze dressings for peripheral i.v. catheter sites: rates of phlebitis, infiltration, and dislodgment by patients.
    Tripepi-Bova KA; Woods KD; Loach MC
    Am J Crit Care; 1997 Sep; 6(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 9283675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized study comparing IV 3000 (transparent polyurethane dressing) to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.
    Madeo M; Martin C; Nobbs A
    J Intraven Nurs; 1997; 20(5):253-6. PubMed ID: 9369626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Increased risk of bacterial colonization of intravenous catheters covered with transparent adhesive polyurethane bandages, compared to classical gauze bandages].
    Meylan PR
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Dec; 117(50):2013-6. PubMed ID: 3324330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management.
    Maki DG; Stolz SS; Wheeler S; Mermel LA
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Nov; 22(11):1729-37. PubMed ID: 7956275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters. Gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing.
    Maki DG; Ringer M
    JAMA; 1987 Nov; 258(17):2396-403. PubMed ID: 3118061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison and cost-effectiveness analysis of peripheral catheter dressings.
    Salles FT; Santos VL; Secoli SR; Aron S; Debbio CB; Baptista CC; Rogenski NM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Sep; 53(9):26-33. PubMed ID: 17893427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transparent I.V. dressings vs. traditional dressings. An inservice evaluation.
    Haessler RM
    NITA; 1983; 6(3):169-70. PubMed ID: 6554461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a radial arterial catheter dressing.
    Healy C; Baldwin I; Currey J; Driscoll A
    Crit Care Resusc; 2018 Mar; 20(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 29458323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of two securement techniques for short peripheral intravenous catheters.
    Wood D
    J Intraven Nurs; 1997; 20(6):280-5. PubMed ID: 9423389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of gauze versus transparent dressings for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.
    Pettit DM; Kraus V
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1995 Sep; 30(3):495-506. PubMed ID: 7567574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two methods of peripheral intravenous cannula securement in the pediatric setting.
    Callaghan S; Copnell B; Johnston L
    J Infus Nurs; 2002; 25(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 12131508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bacterial colonization and phlebitis-associated risk with transparent polyurethane film for peripheral intravenous site dressings.
    Hoffmann KK; Western SA; Kaiser DL; Wenzel RP; Groschel DH
    Am J Infect Control; 1988 Jun; 16(3):101-6. PubMed ID: 3408013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peripheral intravenous catheter dressing and securement practice is associated with site complications and suboptimal dressing integrity: A secondary analysis of 40,637 catheters.
    Corley A; Ullman AJ; Mihala G; Ray-Barruel G; Alexandrou E; Rickard CM
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Dec; 100():103409. PubMed ID: 31629208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Care of the Broviac catheter.
    Duval A; Hennessy K
    NITA; 1983; 6(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 6551687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A pilot trial of bordered polyurethane dressings, tissue adhesive and sutureless devices compared with standard polyurethane dressings for securing short-term arterial catheters.
    Edwards M; Rickard CM; Rapchuk I; Corley A; Marsh N; Spooner AJ; Mihala G; Fraser JF
    Crit Care Resusc; 2014 Sep; 16(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 25161019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Blisterfilm and gauze for peritoneal catheter exit site care.
    Moore CG
    ANNA J; 1989 Dec; 16(7):475-8. PubMed ID: 2604449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hydrocolloid wafer dressings and atrial catheter access sites.
    Hoyman K; Griffin S; Drew D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1989; 22():22-7. PubMed ID: 2719803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.