BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

549 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6924871)

  • 1. Performance appraisal of staff nurses - part III. Developing performance standards and an evaluation tool for staff nurses.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(5):36-44. PubMed ID: 6924871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nursing management in critical care units. Performance appraisal of staff nurses: Part I.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 6918283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the scene: University of Cincinnati Hospital. Confronting inadequate clinical performance.
    Gallagher PH; Teehan MP
    Nurs Adm Q; 1985; 9(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 3844110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating supplemental professional nurses.
    Metzger NJ
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):54-5, 58-9, 62. PubMed ID: 2294495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
    Goodykoontz L
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance appraisal tests for staff nurses.
    Cunningham CV
    Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(22):suppl 16: 61-3. PubMed ID: 6909815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Establishing a criterion-based performance appraisal for a department of nursing.
    Megel MA
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1983 Sep; 18(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 6554709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance appraisal of staff nurses - Part II. Analyzing the old and planning for the new.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(4):89-90. PubMed ID: 6925523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of nursing personnel in the hospitals of the Emilia Romagna region].
    Simonini L
    Prof Inferm; 1984; 37(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 6425839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Staff appraisal. Starting from scratch.
    Dimmock S
    Nurs Times; 1985 Jul 24-30; 81(30):54-5. PubMed ID: 3848887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Seminar on nursing administration: personnel rating].
    Kong SK
    Taehan Kanho; 1984 Dec; 23(5):28-39. PubMed ID: 6569267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nurse performance: strengths and weaknesses.
    McCloskey JC; McCain B
    Nurs Res; 1988; 37(5):308-13. PubMed ID: 3419947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of a new critical care nurse.
    McIntyre E
    Focus AACN; 1982; 9(5):3-6. PubMed ID: 6925991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The performance profile: a technique for using appraisals effectively.
    South JC
    J Nurs Adm; 1978 Jan; 8(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 245382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Setting standards and evaluating nursing performance with a single tool.
    Fosbinder D; Vos H
    J Nurs Adm; 1989 Oct; 19(10):23-30. PubMed ID: 2778515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance appraisal of CCU nurses.
    Huang SH; Dasher LA; Varner CF
    Nurs Manage; 1981 Oct; 12(10):50-5. PubMed ID: 6913847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating clinical competency in nursing.
    Lunde KF; Durbin-Lafferty E
    Nurs Manage; 1986 Aug; 17(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 3637728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nursing education/service. Contracting for growth.
    Aroian J; Grant KJ; Gilbert JP
    Am J Nurs; 1984 Aug; 84(8):1042, 1044. PubMed ID: 6565461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
    Lerch EM
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subordinate performance appraisal: what nurses really want in their managers.
    Tayler CM
    Can J Nurs Adm; 1992; 5(3):6-9. PubMed ID: 1463762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.