These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [The radiation field in working with yttrium 87-strontium 87+m-column and with strontium 87m]. Grebe SF; Römer M Strahlentherapie; 1969 Dec; 138(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 5383607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Radiation protection and new radiodiagnostic methods]. Zedgenidze GA; Narkevich BIa Med Radiol (Mosk); 1985 Apr; 30(4):60-6. PubMed ID: 3887087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Requirements for radiation protection in the use of stomatological radiodiagnostic installations]. Taschner P; König W; Andreas M; Trinius W Stomatol DDR; 1976 Mar; 26(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 1066824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Risk of radiation exposure in X-ray examination of the thorax. German Central Committee for the Control of Tuberculosis (DZK)]. Konietzko N; Jung H; Hering KG; Schmidt T; Pneumologie; 2001 Feb; 55(2):57-71. PubMed ID: 11268886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Personal monitoring period for radiographers. Doust C Radiography; 1986; 52(603):109-12. PubMed ID: 3749488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Medical monitoring of radiation-exposed persons in Austria]. Holeczke F Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1977; 18():168-70. PubMed ID: 601821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Problems of monitoring radiation protection systems of the staff in intracavitary gynecological radiotherapy]. Török I; Boros L Strahlentherapie; 1969 Dec; 138(6):677-84. PubMed ID: 5381724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Roentgen diagnosis and radiation hazards]. Omsveen P Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1988 Aug; 108(23):1759-60. PubMed ID: 3420578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The choosing wisely campaign and its potential impact on diagnostic radiation burden. Mahesh M; Durand DJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):65-6. PubMed ID: 23211613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of the use of nuclear medicine on the irradiation of the population and occupationally exposed persons]. Mănescu S; Andreescu GH; Milu C; Georgescu G; Paşcu G Physiologie; 1985; 22(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 3919409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Estimating patient dosage in radiologic examinations. Effective doses of the most frequent roentgen examinations]. Keske U; Hierholzer J; Neumann K; Cordes M; Venz S; Amthauer H; Matschke S; Felix R Radiologe; 1995 Mar; 35(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 7761592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Possible sequelae of excessive medical irradiation in the United States of America]. Morgan KZ Rontgenblatter; 1974 Mar; 27(3):127-46. PubMed ID: 4824112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Origin, effect and hazards of roentgen rays. II]. Chiari R Krankenpfl J; 1986 Mar; 24(3):4-11. PubMed ID: 3634128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Results of radiation safety surveys of X-ray facilities within the Bureau of Prisons and Federal Health Programs Service. Miller LA; Seabron LC Radiol Health Data Rep; 1971 Mar; 12(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 5550317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Engineering safety standard of radiation. Benhuri MN; Ugural AC N Y State Dent J; 1977 Dec; 43(10):594-6. PubMed ID: 270645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [New order on the protection from injuries due to roentgen rays. Introduction and explanation of roentgenologic rulings]. Sonnabend E; Tadsen H Zahnarztl Mitt; 1973 Aug; 63(16):757-63. PubMed ID: 4518649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]