These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6926014)

  • 1. Options for assuring continuing competency.
    Shilling M
    Issues; 1982; 3(3):3-4. PubMed ID: 6926014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Continuing education vs. continuing competence.
    Forni PR
    J Nurs Adm; 1975; 5(9):34-8. PubMed ID: 1042119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Debate: regulatory vs. professional approaches to continued competence.
    Cipriano P
    Issues; 1986; 7(4):6-8. PubMed ID: 3641793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. All you need to know about clinical effectiveness.
    Moores Y
    Nurs Times; 1998 Jul 8-14; 94(27):26-7. PubMed ID: 9739675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ensuring quality nursing care: legal and regulatory processes.
    Siegel S
    Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Apr; ():3-8. PubMed ID: 15112420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assuring nursing competence.
    Burbach V
    Nebr Nurse; 1999 Dec-2000 Feb; 32(4):6-9; quiz 10-1. PubMed ID: 11998099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using nursing standards to evaluate competency.
    Kuehn L; Jackson K
    Nurs Manage; 1997 Aug; 28(8):32K, 32N, 32P. PubMed ID: 9325950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Building nursing competencies for quality nursing practice.
    Davidson S
    Oreg Nurse; 2000 Feb; 65(1):3. PubMed ID: 12024569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical assessment: a state-of-the-art review.
    Bashook PG
    Diabetes Educ; 1985 Dec; 11 Suppl():30-6. PubMed ID: 3853979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review among rural clinics.
    Hiserote JL; Bultemeier K; Kimberly SL; Nicoll JE; Wheeler K
    Nurse Pract; 1980; 5(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 7354951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality improvement in nursing care].
    van Eindhoven JM; de Hey W
    Tijdschr Ziekenverpl; 1980 Jul; 33(15):696-700. PubMed ID: 6902579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regulation of health care professionals, Part 2: Validation of continued competence.
    Gunn IP
    CRNA; 1999 Aug; 10(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 10723291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assuring competence: building skills validation labs.
    Guy J
    Aspens Advis Nurse Exec; 1993 Dec; 9(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 8274341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competency-based evaluation: not just for new nurses (continuing education credit).
    Feeney J; Benson-Landau M
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 1987; 6(6):368-72, 375. PubMed ID: 3691291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance: an educational approach.
    Griffith NL; Megel ME
    Nurs Outlook; 1981 Nov; 29(11):670-3. PubMed ID: 6913874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Staff development challenge: assuring nurses' competency in quality assessment and improvement.
    Finnick M; Crosby F; Ventura MR
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1993; 9(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 8326412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nursing peer review: monitoring the appropriateness and outcome of nursing care.
    Whittaker A; McCanless L
    J Nurs Qual Assur; 1988 Feb; 2(2):24-31. PubMed ID: 3335590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competency statements evaluating nurses performance.
    Tonkin C
    Inforum; 1991; 12():39-42. PubMed ID: 1765402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Web-based learning resources - new opportunities for competency development.
    Moen A; Nygård KA; Gauperaa T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 146():529-33. PubMed ID: 19592899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Point: should CRNAs in nontraditional clinical worksettings be subject to mandatory peer review of their clinical practice?
    Vercellino CE
    Nurse Anesth; 1991 Jun; 2(2):59-60; discussion 61-4. PubMed ID: 2043687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.