These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 692667)

  • 1. NIH confirms violation of recombinant DNA research guidelines.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1978 May; 273(5657):5. PubMed ID: 692667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DNA: let the public choose.
    Wright S
    Nature; 1978 Oct; 275(5680):468. PubMed ID: 692727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New rulebook for gene splicers faces one more test.
    Wade N
    Science; 1978 Aug; 201(4356):600-1. PubMed ID: 353985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MSU faults Strobel for Dutch elm test.
    Roberts L
    Science; 1987 Sep; 237(4820):1286. PubMed ID: 3629239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Another violation of NIH guidelines.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1980 Aug; 286(5774):649. PubMed ID: 6893357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recombinant DNA research: beyond the NIH guidelines.
    Grobstein C
    Science; 1976 Dec; 194(4270):1133-5. PubMed ID: 1069374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules.
    Wilson DJ
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rifkin versus gene splicing: NIH wins a round.
    Norman C
    Science; 1985 Jul; 229(4710):252. PubMed ID: 4012320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA guidelines for further attenuation.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1981 Mar; 290(5804):281. PubMed ID: 7207619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spectacular science and ponderous process.
    Singer MF
    Science; 1979 Jan; 203(4375):9. PubMed ID: 758684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US to increase public participation in regulation of DNA research.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1978 Nov; 276(5687):430. PubMed ID: 723919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public regulation of recombinant dna gene therapy.
    McGarity TO; Shapiro SA
    J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):185-210. PubMed ID: 6981676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. US drug companies push for changes in recombinant DNA guidelines.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1979 Mar; 278(5703):385-6. PubMed ID: 450039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introduction to recombinant DNA research, development and evolution of the NIH guidelines, and proposed legislation.
    Talbot B
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):804-14. PubMed ID: 11649587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. US extends recombinant DNA controls to private industry.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1978 Dec 21-28; 276(5690):744. PubMed ID: 723950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No NIH ban.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1982 Jul; 298(5870):111. PubMed ID: 7088166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolution of the NIH guidelines.
    Milewski EA
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1981 Dec; 4(4):160-5. PubMed ID: 7029672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Petition to amend the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules to establish a Public Policy Advisory Committee. Foundation on Economic Trends, September 18, 1990.
    Hum Gene Ther; 1991; 2(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 1911933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH urged to act on germ war.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1982 Jun; 297(5867):527. PubMed ID: 7088135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recombinant DNA research: the scope and limits of regulation.
    Krimsky S; Ozonoff D
    Am J Public Health; 1979 Dec; 69(12):1252-9. PubMed ID: 507257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.