162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6927145)
1. [Nonstress monitoring in high-risk pregnancy].
Díaz L; Salinas R; Rubio R
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1981; 46(6):291-300. PubMed ID: 6927145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Daily antenatal cardiotocography in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
Weiss DB; Pugh C; Simmons SC
Int Surg; 1977 Sep; 62(9):470-5. PubMed ID: 908631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal stress and nonstress tests: an analysis and comparison of their ability to identify fetal outcome.
Pratt D; Diamond F; Yen H; Bieniarz J; Burd L
Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 54(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 492619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The nonstress test. A preliminary report of a graded classification.
O'Leary JA; Mendenhall HW; Andrinopoulos GC
J Reprod Med; 1980 Nov; 25(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 7452634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Interpretation of the fetal heart rate in pregnancy and labor].
Künzel W; Hohmann M
Gynakologe; 1984 Dec; 17(4):255-64. PubMed ID: 6519556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Antepartal cardiotocography in the assessment of fetal outcome.
Käär K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1980; 94():1-56. PubMed ID: 6935909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal heart rate acceleration: fetal movement ratio in the management of high-risk pregnancy.
Arias JW; Saldana LR; Rivera-Alsina M; Ali V
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Oct; 60(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 7121928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The non-stress test. A test without stimulus for determining fetal well-being].
Vazquez Zárate VM; Villanueva Sámano LC
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1983 Aug; 51(316):213-6. PubMed ID: 6681302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The significance of fetal heart rate decelerations during nonstress testing.
Bourgeois FJ; Thiagarajah S; Harbert GM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 150(2):213-6. PubMed ID: 6476042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antenatal fetal heart rate testing in high-risk pregnancies.
Löfgren O
Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Oct; 58(4):438-43. PubMed ID: 7197009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of cord compression in normal-risk pregnancies using ultrasonography and cardiotocography].
Guzmán Sánchez A; Segura Ortega L; Panduro Barón G
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1984 Mar; 52(323):77-9. PubMed ID: 6386622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sinusoidal heart rate].
Halberstadt E; Born HJ; Schroyens E
Gynakologe; 1994 Jun; 27(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 7926958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The fetal non-stress test.
Kirkwood CR; Eggertsen S
J Fam Pract; 1983 Aug; 17(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 6875489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies.
Cederlind CJ
J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prognostic value of prenatal monitoring of the fetal heart rate].
Leibschang J
Probl Med Wieku Rozwoj; 1982; 11():149-68. PubMed ID: 7178078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of fetal venous blood flow under normal circumstances and during fetal disease.
Hecher K; Campbell S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jan; 7(1):68-83. PubMed ID: 8932638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The fetal monitoring polemic.
Schifrin BS
Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 6749379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Electronic monitoring evidence of fetal distress in high-risk pregnancies.
Peck T
J Reprod Med; 1980 Mar; 24(3):103-8. PubMed ID: 7373591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cardiotocographic findings during amniocentesis in monitoring high-risk pregnancies].
Paladini A; Di Lieto A; Rullo F; Catalano D
Minerva Ginecol; 1980 Oct; 32(10):881-6. PubMed ID: 7432698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cardiotocographic monitoring in pregnancy: some cases of sporadic decelerations (author's transl)].
Cavatorta E; Crignaffini A; Rifail K; Trentadue R
Ateneo Parmense Acta Biomed; 1978; 49(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 154332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
