These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6927809)
1. Legal implications of artificial conception. Making babies makes law. Palm MT Med Trial Tech Q; 1982; 28(4):404-23. PubMed ID: 6927809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New innovations in conception and their effects upon our law and morality. Shapiro ED NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1986; 31(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 11658943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial conception: legislative approaches. Krause HD Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right of abortion in surrogate motherhood arrangements. D'Aversa CY North Ill Univ Law Rev; 1987; 7(1):1-39. PubMed ID: 11658910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Test tube babies: legal issues raised by in vitro fertilization. Flannery DM Georgetown Law J; 1979 Aug; 67(6):1295-345. PubMed ID: 11664058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law. Wadlington W Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Man-made man and the law. Tuchler DJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1978; 22(2):310-25. PubMed ID: 11664955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Parental rights and the definition of motherhood in surrogate motherhood. Rae SB South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1994; 3(2):219-77. PubMed ID: 11660411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The new reproductive technologies and the law: a Roman Catholic perspective. Wagner WJ J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():37-70. PubMed ID: 11645612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Brief of the Law Reform Commission of Canada to the Royal Commission on new reproductive technologies. Jones DJ Health Law Can; 1992; 13(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 10121310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues. Field M Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to parenthood and the best interests of the child: a perspective on surrogate motherhood in Jewish and Israeli law. Shifman P N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):555-68. PubMed ID: 11650205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal issues of the new reproductive technologies. Kinney LH Calif State Bar J; 1977; 52(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 11665044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New frontiers in conception: medical breakthroughs and moral dilemmas. Fleming AT N Y Times Mag; 1980 Jul; ():14-23, 42, 48+. PubMed ID: 11647742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioethics and fatherhood. Callahan D Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):735-46. PubMed ID: 11656532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. New methods of conception and their legal status. Pilpel HF N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1985; 3():13-33. PubMed ID: 16100809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of legal parentage in egg donation, embryo transplantation, and gestational surrogacy arrangements. Goodwin A Fam Law Q; 1992; 26(3):275-91. PubMed ID: 11659602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]